what's the problem again?

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Apr 13, 2012 at 22:46

Mr Abdullah writes:

"Why didn't you deal with John 14:19?"

I assume Mr Abdullah is adrressing me? What do you mean 'deal with' , Mr Abdullah? But before we go into this particular Biblical verse - Mr Abdullah has not 'dealt with' any of the issues that have been pointed out to him - and reports of which occur daily in the mainstream media.. None of the examples given have been covered at all - such as

Prison sentences and even beheadings for the 'crime' of apostasy from Islam.

Limb amputations for property theft

Stoning for extra-marital affairs

Arranged marriages

Marriages to close relatives

Child marriages - and those last three cover arranged marriages to children who are also blood relatives

Female genital mutilation

Systemic abrogation of a commitment to women's rights and general equality.

Fostering anti-Semitic sentiments and a pathological hatred of Jews in general.

Human rights abuses against non-musilms (and non-mainstream muslims) in Muslim countries - and even in none muslim countries.

This is by no means an exhaustive list - but it will help you , Mr Abdullah, in that you now have a specific list to do your best to rationalise and explain away. Taqiyyah is welcome - as it shows you up for what you are - a spokesperson for a Bronze Age cult that has no relevance in Western society - trying his damndest to justify his and his cults primitive beliefs and why we should be 'respecting' them.

Now - getting back to Mr Abdullah's non-sequitur, - "Why didn't you deal with John 14:19?"

Why does Mr Abdullah persist in his attempts to use non-muslim scriptures - which muslims are told are corrupt - in order to try to prove some obscure religious point.? Why do you do this Mr Abdullah? It has been pointed out by myself and others how illogical it is - yet you continue to do so! It reeks of hypocrisy -if that is of any concern to you.

Mr Abdullah - you also have not 'dealt with' the question of which muslims have decided for you which bits of non-muslim scriptures such as the Bible are corrupt. Are you going to do so?

Does this mean you are not up to the challenge of rewriting the Bible - or at least the New Testament - in order to show Christians and others what REALLY happened - by taking out all the bits that muslims object to. But it seems Mr Abdullah, you have not yet jumped at the chance to bring clarity and your wisdom to this vexing issue .. Why not? As I said - Allah would have to be most grateful to you I'm sure , if you were to do this - for all the points and more that I've outlined in a previous post.

Otherwise Mr Abdullah, unfortunately you'll end up seeming like just another empty-headed religious hypocrite - making claims without substance trying to justify their particular and very unique world view

OK, let's see what " John 14:19 says:

• New King James Version (NKJV) "A little while longer and the world will see Me no more, but you will see Me. Because I live, you will live also."

So which parts of that are a problem for you ,Mr Abdullah? What is the issue? Why does anyone need to 'deal with' it?

"...I'm not trying to say Muhammad of 1400 years ago, but one whose name would be Muhammad."

Ok, so seeing that Mo is the most popular boy's name in fast-breeding muslim families - which particular Mo did you have in mind? Someone you know in your local madrassa or mosque?

"For after physical death your body that you are in now does not get up out of the grave."

Aha ! A very, very astute observation. I see you must have been studying Islamic science for some time then.

"The Creator said be fruitful and multiply,"

bit there is no subtext that says - 'and iselfishly and rresponsibly have as many children as you can (with your first cousins with the consequential risks of retardation ,other health issues and the imopost and the health and educational sectors of your host country) ) on a planet already straining from overpopulation - and bring them up at the expense of your host country's social security system in the hope that you will outbreed the Infidels and replace their corrupt system with one shining Sharia state" - is there?

" for that which is from you is you."

First - can you let us know where exactly that was written? And what does it mean exactly. It's a very obscure and open-ended statement you'd have to agree. It certainly opens up a whole philosophical debate on identity and ego boundaries doesn't it?

Hopefully it's not referring to fluids expelled from the body in sneezing , vomiting, urination, defecation etc. Or does it mean genetic DNA material? Putting it into perspective for us , Mr Abdullah - do you really believe you are any of those things?

Perhaps in future you could quote things that actually had some relevance?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".