The Uighur and their little jihad and the sordid woman Rebiya Kadeer

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 4, 2012 at 07:45

Ianus wrote

and break-up of China through Uyghur jihadism .

I really agree with you. Supporting the Uighur in any form or shape is a big mistake and for the readers these are Chinese Muslims and yes jihad is not very far behind.

And what is most amazing is this sordid woman Rebiya Kadeer who lives the good life in Washington at this time and she is provided with grants to run her little operation of the Uighur American Association and the World Uighur Congress and in the meantime she is living the good life here in the US and these two organizations are accused by the Chinese of "helping and abetting terrorism and jihadism" and i do happen to believe the Chinese

This is not unlike supporting Ben Laden and his gang in the 1980's and for those of you that want to know more about this strange character Rebiya here is an article in today's NYT about this darling of our political elite http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/k/rebiya_kadeer/index.html

And the ultimate hypocrisy is to compare this wannabe Arab with the Dalai Lama

Howvere in an article in the Asia Times

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KG18Ad01.html by Donlad Kirk wrote that we neither have the money nor the will to get those Uighur and this woman to fulfill their dream of jihad. In other words I could see another disaster not unlike Afghanistan if the US would help the Uighur on a big scale because if this happens then jihadists will flock to thier little paradise of Uighuristan! but thank God we do not have the money to bankroll another little jihad

The question is when would we learn that our enemy is not China but Islam and jihadists?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".