Illogical argument

Submitted by Doug (United States), Aug 20, 2012 at 22:59

Your dissertation is in cohesive, to use a singular argument to prove a point while denying all other sources of history is dangerous. To believe that Mohamed may have not existed creates a extremely dangerous precedent, that opens the door to questioning all other history. I equate this to the modern revisionist historian who deny the reality of the Holocaust, while victims are still walking with tattooed numbers on their arms. make my blood curl.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".