Whose ramble ?

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Aug 22, 2012 at 06:41

Doug wrote :

>Let's end this discussion here, you just offer a ramble.<

Frankly, I would feel deeply offended if I read something appreciative coming from such a dull doctrinaire ...

>You remind me of a conspiracy theorist, just because you state something it needs to be proven wrong. NO, you need to prove to provide historical references that quantify your assertion.<

It is in principle impossible to prove anything to people whom their worldview and/or salary has made immune to any contrary evidence. In other words, if you were not what you unfortunately are, I would suggest browsing the old papers of the Church Committee to see how conspiracy theory is universally practised by the state. But I agree with you. Why waste time on teaching anything to an unteachable type ... ?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".