Boys and girls: Now we have a new term by the enablers of Islamists: Christianists!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 14, 2012 at 09:31

Dr. Pipes

I find it really annoying when Islamists and their enablers, Brits included, tell us what the first amendment is all about.

In this case it is the article that was written by Malise Ruthven (And I used to respect him very much and indeed his book about what really happened on 9/11 is an outstanding book for those of us that study islam and the history of islam http://www.amazon.com/Fury-God-Islamist-Attack-America/dp/1862075735)

You will find his article in the NY review of books http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/oct/11/can-islam-be-criticized/ he seems to be changing direction and he tells us that we kuffar should not be critical of the prophet of islam because Muslims get angry and they cannot control themselves and they have riots and mayhem but this would really mean that he is saying that a whole group of people cannot control their emotions and that they can be violent which would make him according to the definition of what is really Islamophobia as an islamophobe as per item 4 http://www.islamophobia.org/readarticle.php?article_id=25

Now he is introducing another stupid term called: Christianist! But he never tells us what is a Christianist so I'm sure the left must be busy trying to tell us what is this Christianist really means

I also believe that the Islamists and their enablers (Mr Ruthven inculded) are realizing that the term islamophobia is a ridiculous term as was proven by the late Chris Hitchens in this great article http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_1_urbanities-steyn.html so now the enablers of Islamists have to come up with this silly term Christianist what ever that is

But this is not where it ends in another great article by the late Chris Hitchens in Slate magazine in 2007 where he was defending the term islamofascism he crosses path with no other than Malise Ruthven http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2007/10/defending_islamofascism.html and the most surprising thing is: It is malise Ruthven himself that introduced such term which is very disliked by Islamists including the loons at Loonwatch and the fakes Reza Aslan and Jonathan Lean and the thugs at EI and and their enablers. So it makes you wonder that may be Mr. Ruthven is trying to make peace with islamists and their enablers as Salman Rushdi tried once and failed and it would serve him right

Oh there is more: Mr Ruthven describes Mr. Nakoula Baseely as a "militant, Coptic separatist"! really? What on earth is this? But he fails to tell us and only name calling! Malise Ruthven fails to tell us that nothing in this horrible video we will not find in the Islamic historical and that the Copts the people of this "militant Coptic separatist" are suffering under islam, islamists and islamofacism

And would Mr. Ruthven call Jews that remind the world of what happened to 6M Jews by exposing the atrocities of the nazis in a youtube video as; Militant Jewish separatists and would he call Armenians that post a vioeo on youtube to remind the world of what happend to1.5M Armenians at the hand of the muslim Turks as; militant Armenian separatist?

But again we live in very interesting times

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".