Teaching one tablighee at a time

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 10, 2013 at 08:02

Our dear Ali Baba wrote

You're absoluted (sic) right,

Thank you our dear Ali Baba so this means that you disagree with Allah astaghfirullah? You think that i should tell your masters the wahhabis that you our dear Ali Baba disagress with Allah? what would happen to you any guesses?

the Bible has been corrupted.

Really? but this cannot be true unless you diagree with Allah again and here is why your Allah says that the Bible cannot be corrupted and these were chats with two tablighees like you our dear Amin who also ran away and our dear slayhy who also ran away

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 3, 2011 at 09:21

our dear Amin whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam had given up on the Quanic disaster of in hadhan lasahiran and why is that our dear Amin the deobandi tablighee? And I'm still waiting for my ticket on al-buraq so you and i can converse in Arabic a language that you cannot speak read or write right mr fake?

Oh and speaking of the Bible let me see your Allah says وانزل التوراـة والانجيل

Do you know what this means? let me help you your Allah is saying that he is the author of the NT and the OT and this is Allah's claim

So congratulations our dear Amin but Allah says that he is the author of the NT and the OT

Oh there is more then your Allah says that لاتبديل لكلمات الله و لا مبدل لكلمته

Oh darn it the Arabic! let me help you here your Allah is saying that he is the author of the NT and the OT and that no one can change his words and do you know what? it means that the OT and the NT are not corrupted right mr fake?

Oh there is more then your Allah says that Christians and Jews can find the name of Muhammad in the OT and NT where he says الذين يتبعون الرسول النبي الامى الذي يجدونه مكتوبا عندهم في التوراـة والانجيل

So let me see your Allah is using the Bible as a reference to prove that you can find the name of his so called prophet in both books

So you see why would Allah use a reference that is corrupted and do you know what this means? it means that both NT and OT are not corrupted and these are your Islamic sources:

Oh there is more even Ibn Ishaq tells us the same that the Bible could not have been corrupted

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 2, 2012 at 10:45

Our dear slayhy you still did not tell us readers: why do you quote the Bible to prove a point after all you claim that the Bible is a corrupted book right O glorious madrassa graduate?

The difference between you and me is that you follow a corrupted book, I follow a divine book

But our dear slayhy whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam even Ibn Ishaq' quotes the Bible to prove that we kuffar can find the name of Muhammad in the Bible which means that the Bible cannot be a corrupted book after all how can he quote a corrupted book to prove his point? You tell us ya ayuha al-gahbi al-kabeer

Oh there is more so Ibn Ishaq tells us that Muhammad is really منحّمنا في اللغة السوريانية ya nahar eswid he is saying that the word Muhammad in Syriac is Munahhmana! and this is one evidence that you can find the name of Muhammad in the Syriac Bible

But wait Ibn Ishaq did not even get it as the word nahem in Syriac ܢܚܡ means to raise from the dead and as far as we know Muhammad did not "rise from the dead" and it was Jesus therefore:

Congratulations our dear slayhy the lost tablighee but Ibn Ishaq's Munahhemana is really Christ who must be the Muhammada(n) or the blessed

Sorry it is your sources that are telling us that

Oh there is more Ibn Ishaq also tells us that البرقليتس , oh let me help you with this one, or the Paraclete is Muhammad in Greek

But now we have established that Jesus is really the one who "raise from the dead" therefore he is really the Muhammda(n) therefore Jesus must be the paraclete as per ibn ishaq

And you know what? this is what the Syrians tell us as in St. Ephrem who told us that Jesus is the Paraclete

Then congratulations our dear slayhy but ibn Ishaq is really saying that Jesus is the Munahhemana as well as the Paralete and therofore he must be the Muhammad(n) or the blessed one

It is your islamic sources that tell us all of this and if you do not like it then destory them and good riddance

Oh the Qur'an? It is the most corrupted so called holy book and a case in point again the rasm ملك was read by the ulama that EDITED the Qur'an as مالكِ or the onwer of in the Cairo Qur'an and as ملكِ or the king of in the Tunisian Qur'an and I'm sure that you agree with me the big time kafir that the owner of is not the king of and do you know what this simple example means?

1. It means that the ulama have no clue what the Qur'an really says

2. That the ulama edited the Qur'an and this makes it a corrupted book

3. It means that Allah inspite of his claim that no one can alter his words which means that the Qur'an cannot be his words otherwise he would have stopped the ulama from corrupting the Qur'an

But how do you know the Quran hasn't been corrupted too?

The Qur'an is a corrupted book too and I'm not the one who is saying that it is your master Sheikh al-Azhar and read this

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 21, 2012 at 13:05

Our dear Amin Riaz who ran away and who lives among them Christians and jews that corrupted their books and he also lives among Hindus and we are told by tablighees that we can also find the name of Muhammad in the Hindu holy books and I'm not kidding you so is that true our dear Amin Raiz al-tablighee?

So our dear Amin Riaz who ran away is not happy because I reminded him that he is not supposed to quote the Bible because it is a corrupted book right our dear Amin Riaz? Now he is wondering why do I quote the Qur'an and I did explain to him that the Qur'an like it or not is a text written at a point in time by human beings for other human beings and it is the by-product of a linguistic and cultural and historical milieu at a point in time and I care less if it is corrupted or not and the pagan Greeks taught long time ago that "claims invite scrutiny" and this is why we kuffar examine the Qur'an with a microscope now do you get it our dear Amin?

Now it is not us kuffar that say that the Qur'an is a corrupted book it is Muslims that say so and here is your master Sheikh al-Azhar telling us about the many readings of the Qur'anhttp://elazhar.com/qadaiaux/2.asp where he tells us about the Quranic disaster of تعدد مصاحف القران or the multiple codices of the Qur'an and logic would dictate that if we have multiple codices of a book that claims to be in one form in the so called al-lawh al-mahfouz then all these codices are corrupt with the exception of one but which one is it our dear Amin Raiz any guesses? so does Allah has more than one lawh mahfouz any guesses?

He also tells us about http://elazhar.com/qadaiaux/3.asp or تعدد قراءات القران or the multiple readings of the Qur'an which means that there must be only one correct form and the other ones are no more than corruption right our dear Amin Riaz who lives among kuffar? You see it is your sources that tell us the the Qur'an sia corrupted book

Now enter the Shi3a and their claims that the Qur'an we have does not include one or two more suras http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/194879 or surat al-nurain or سورة النورين and surat al-wilaya or سورة الولاية http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/194967 but you will not find them in the Qur'an and if this indeed is true then the Qur'an must have been corrupted now do you get it? and you know what? Unless we have a real copy of Allah's copy in his al-lawh al-mahfouz we have no way of knowing so until then the Qur'an is really corrupted book so do you have a direct line with Allah and may be you can call and ask him which copy does he have in his al-lawh al-mahfouz deal?

Oh there is more and I urge the readers to check Q53:32 in surat al-nijm it is very clear that this little gem is out of place in this sura which is otherwise very uniform and sounds like a poem and indeed the ulama noticed it and it was regarded as either an interpolation aka corruption or it is really not part of this Meccan Sura and it must have been revealed in Medina so which one is it you tell us! What a disaster

So you see our dear Amin Riaz al-tablighee it is not us kuffar that says the Qur'an is a corrupted book it is Muslims that are telling us so

So you see our dear Ali Baba the wannabe Arab I'm not the author of this poor Islamic theology it is your Allah

If the Bible, God's word can be corrupted, why not Allah's word?

Well may be we need to do lunch with Allah and you can ask him! Oh darn it your Allah is an Arab he does not speak Urdu! Oh do not panic I will do the talking and oh order for me the ham and wine

Do you think Allah's words are more special than God's

Which Allah is that and which god is that?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".