ad hominem

Submitted by Christopher (United States), Mar 1, 2013 at 07:27

I would be interested in hearing Dr Pipes actually argue against the topic at hand rather than just assume the stupidity of Dr Waltz. Does Dr. Pipes have any evidence that suggests that nuclear powers do not balance each other? Does he have an example where nuclear deterrence has failed? Is there any indication that Iran is not a rational state and would act in a manner to preserve its self interest?

Dr. Waltz has provided a valid argument based on evidence and past experience. Dr. Pipes calls him an idiot and believes he has refuted Dr. Waltz's argument. Yet I am still here wondering, can Dr. Pipes provide a thoughtful and logical analysis of the situation and provide a counter argument, or is his only defense ad hominem?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".