Sleuth D.B.exposes even more on the hidden hands behind ISIS

Submitted by Jeff (United States), Jan 20, 2018 at 18:42

Always a pleasure to hear from a man who chooses to live in the world's largest democracy.

Please direct me to where I said that the Islamic State is a monstrous group. I don't recall that. Far be it from me to hurl insults at a group that the learned religious leaders of Al Azhar have refused to call un-Islamic.

Concluding that the use of drones by the Islamic State (or Hezbollah) indicates US and Israeli support is breathtakingly idiotic. Drones are available on-line for only a few thousand dollars and ISIS always had plenty of Arab Muslim donors. Not to mention its oil business. And whatever money they stole from thousands of people they murdered.

And of course the Islamic State's behavior has nothing to do with any philosophy or belief. Or whom they look to as a beautiful example of conduct. It's the Jews. It's the Americans. It's Daniel Pipes.

It's much easier and more fun to blame Americans and Jews for everything bad that's ever happened in the world than it is to engage in actual thinking. But sometimes the more difficult path is the better path. I doubt you'll ever figure that out.

P.S. I still think you're wrong about little 10 year old Jessi Paulis Issa having been a CIA agent when Muslims shot her to death as she was leaving Sunday school one morning.

P.P.S. Good news, Debanjan, your heroine of the century, Chelsea Manning, is running for the US Senate. Despite all the torture she received at the hands of the Obama administration (according to you} she seems to be doing OK and never passes up a chance to be in front of a camera or microphone. And I'm sure she would be happy to take a campaign contribution, hopefully a large one, from an appreciative fan such as yourself.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".