Dr Mohmed Rahoma on the language of the Qur'an and that it is not Classical Arabic and the Quranic وشهد شاهد من اهلها

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 15, 2018 at 10:09

Gato you might be interested in watching this video by the brave and very interesting Dr Mohamed Rahoma He is Egyptian and he studies the Qur'an

In the video he talks about the bogus Quranic claim that it is: Quranan 'Arabian (Arabic Qur'an) He talks about very strange Quranic words the likes of Ahad and Samad in Surat al-Ikhlas and the word al-Kawthar (which has no meaning) in Surat al-Kawthar

He makes it very clear that the word Ahad, in the context of verse 112:1 is a Hebrew word (it is also a Syriac word) Very interesting video and more evidence that al-Mufasereen had not clue and that Quranic Arabic is not classical Arabic And this is what happened: Classical Arabic (CA) is derived from Quranic Arabic Shocking but true

No one ever spoke CA and it was the conquered nations that created what the Arabic language is all about in its various forms be it dialects or new forms of Arabic as in Egyptian Arabic and Maghribi Arabic and the Maltese language

Here is the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nvtl2Wme5w

Oh وشهد شاهد من اهلها? It is the Quranic "And there was a witness from her own people"

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".