69 million page views

Question for Dr. Pipes regarding Green zone in Baghdad

Reader comment on item: Tempering Ambitions [in Iraq]

Submitted by American Muslim (United States), Dec 3, 2006 at 00:58

Dear Dr. Pipes,

I am an avid reader of your essays. Thank you for great work.

My question and comment is: "Why don't we get out of that cocoon called Green zone?" No I don't mean we should abandon the green zone. My issue is with us getting stuck in it. Why haven't we been able to expand it?

Let's get 5 mile belt that circles the green zone. Call it purple zone. And run more concentric zone with different colors until the whole of Baghdad and its immediate suburbs are covered. Then slowly and delicately move out of green zone to make each successive zone as safe as possible.

This will be the style of rule Iraqis are familiar with. And they will respect and appreciate Americans. I am sure Sadr will cry and protest when one of these extended zones covers his neighborhood. Do not listen to him or any other Iraqi leader. These guys have no idea how to keep peace. It is time to use American innovation mixed with Middle Eastern style to keep order in the society. We can bring peace in and around Baghdad in 3 months.

Iraqi people badly want action towards semblance of peace. These "Gahwa Meetings" (Middle Eastern Tea cup gathering) between Bush administration and Arabs are not going to help much.

Thank you.

Warm Regards

Dr. Qazi

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

Interesting idea, but I approach it the opposite way, wanting to turn security over to the Iraqis and leave the Green Zone, and especially the embassy within it.

(On the latter, see my blog, "The Largest Embassy Ever Run by any Country".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment

Reader comments (46) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Success in Iraq [161 words]stranchanMay 26, 2012 02:38195842
Iraq in 10 years from now [95 words]sevillaMay 11, 2012 04:30195551
Iraq after withdrawal [66 words]KeralaApr 19, 2012 00:40195188
Question for Dr. Pipes regarding Green zone in Baghdad [227 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
American MuslimDec 3, 2006 00:5868093
Militarily we already won.. but politically? [260 words]AndrewNov 15, 2006 20:4766260
Two Postscripts [95 words]Susan WalkerNov 14, 2006 06:2966070
Kurds and Sunnis [48 words]JayNov 13, 2006 23:2466050
In War: Resolution [263 words]JackdawNov 13, 2006 22:4466047
When We Lost the Battle of Iraq [266 words]Douglas BoggsNov 13, 2006 22:0266043
Goals according to Bush + BEWARE OF SPIN! [193 words]MelMNov 13, 2006 18:4866035
Correct Strategy for Iraq [176 words]Chris ChrismanNov 13, 2006 13:0065999
It Is What It Is [65 words]Jeffrey BradleyNov 12, 2006 23:0065958
Pulling out. [143 words]John RNov 12, 2006 22:3065957
I respectfully disagree. [116 words]John PhilipsNov 12, 2006 22:0465955
National Schizophrenia & Political Paralysis [500 words]AbijahNov 12, 2006 18:2465946
A Caveat [49 words]Richard WittrupNov 12, 2006 17:5665942
Am I the Only Bush Defender? [90 words]lindaNov 15, 2006 17:0265942
You're not alone. [194 words]Kevin MNov 16, 2006 11:5565942
Dare to Be Different [239 words]lindaNov 16, 2006 19:3765942
America's successes or failures in Iraq [276 words]Maurice PicowNov 12, 2006 14:3665926
Iraq [168 words]A. MaranoNov 12, 2006 22:2365926
WOW! [224 words]BlackspeareNov 12, 2006 10:0765912
Some challenges to Dr Pipes' ideas [549 words]Stuart FaginNov 12, 2006 09:4365910
Hold the Fort [489 words]K.H. AhmedNov 12, 2006 08:3665907
ratchet down [133 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDNov 12, 2006 07:4965904
Our Understanding of Iraq [314 words]Leonard MarkowitzNov 12, 2006 05:5865901
West point has not, but Israel certainly had [237 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Yuval Brandstetter MDNov 14, 2006 07:4665901
The Failure of the Bush Doctrine [455 words]Prof. Paul EidelbergNov 12, 2006 01:5865892
Purple Hearts & Defense of Rumsfeld [605 words]lindaNov 11, 2006 22:3965880
Success in Iraq [177 words]Peter NamtvedtNov 11, 2006 21:1065863
We Tried, We Failed [1188 words]J.A. MorrisNov 11, 2006 20:5965861
"We swear we will not rest from our jihad... before blowing up the filthiest house, dubbed the White House," [544 words]FreemanNov 11, 2006 20:5565860
Is this Victory? and Tempering Ambitions [101 words]John LothNov 11, 2006 20:5065858
VICTORY AT ALL COSTS [472 words]JackdawNov 11, 2006 17:5565844
response to your comments [141 words]TinaNov 11, 2006 20:4865844
You are 100000 % correct ! US must crush these Islamist Terrorists ruthlessly [130 words]MahatmaNov 11, 2006 21:1565844
Cultural transfiguration [244 words]David W. LincolnNov 11, 2006 17:0665840
comment on your comment [128 words]TinaNov 11, 2006 20:3765840
All the seven accused in July 11 Terror Attacks are Muslims [151 words]RamanNov 11, 2006 21:3565840
Evaluating societies [158 words]David W. LincolnNov 12, 2006 17:0865840
Point of Clarification [194 words]David W. LincolnNov 12, 2006 17:2065840
Don't give up [162 words]Octavio JohansonNov 11, 2006 16:4065837
you're not up on the news [104 words]TinaNov 11, 2006 20:2965837
Bajaur madrassa trained suicide bombers: Musharraf ( An honest confession of an Islamist ) [301 words]LeaderNov 11, 2006 21:2065837
A perfect exit stategy, unlike Vietnam: Jacobs Ladder comes of age [53 words]Mark-Alan WhittleNov 11, 2006 15:2965831
depressing [261 words]TinaNov 11, 2006 15:1265830

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)