To Dhimmi:

Submitted by Mahfooz-ur Rahman (Bangladesh), Oct 12, 2007 at 23:07

The language and the expressions used by you are beyond modicum of civility...

I am not really surprised that you didn't think it fit to express one word of regret or an iota of sympathy for the victims of the terrorist attack at Ajmer on the praying Muslims, perhaps only because they are Muslims. Perhaps you wish them all, all 1.1 billion of them killed and murdered! Only then you will rest and he satisfied. As I expected you must also have rejoiced at the murders of innocent people and loved to congratulate the terrorists on their great victory over the praying devotees.

But you expressed surprise that India 'allows' Muslim shrines to function and Muslims to pray at mosques! Well, you decided to forget that Muslims constitute 15% of the population of India. They hold many impostant posts including cabinet misnistes of that country. The last President of India was a Muslim, a scientist, who received the highest award of his country for his contribution to development of rocketry and nuclear weapons for his country. In India, as in Bangladesh, all citizens enjoy equal rights under the constitution irrespective of their religious belief. The things you write will not only ever be published anywhere in India but most probably you will attract proceedings under their criminal law for propagating rifts and encouraging religious conflict among the people. If you wish, you may just pick up the phone and talk to the relevant attaché in the India Embassy in your country to reconfirm, should you have any doubt.

Dhimmi, the derogatory expression 'basket case' is not your original expression, as nothing that you have spoken so far is original. It was notoriously used by Henry Kissinger when Nixon's policy of 'tilting' towards the brutal military regime of Pakistan in the war of 1971 failed and Bangladesh won its independence. Later Kissinger's boss had to resign from presidency and only avoided criminal proceedings by a presidential pardon. Kissinger had gone into oblivion long ago. But to his credit, Kissinger apologised later for his rash non diplomatic comment. Yet you use this term again and again to no purpose other than expressing your hatred for a peace loving nation with the highest contribution in the world for the UN Peace Keepers

May we expect an apology from you? Of course not. You stoop so low as to create controversy over a greeting that I preferred to you in all sincerity! At the same time, you claim to defend and propagate ‘Western Civilisation'! Anyone can see that any civilisation, western or whatever else, will do much better if saved from people of your kind, who are really agent provocateur and fifth columnists among their host country.

But what country do you come from? You never disclose the country and the race of your origin and use your adopted country as a shield to spread your vociferous hate. From behind this safe haven you hurl abuses and sow seeds of hatred among different religions and peoples. To correspond with you is to assist you in your nefarious mission that every peace loving person must avoid.

I had thought of replying to your lies in a civil manner but it is impossible to communicate with a person whose only distinction is hatred and insulting people and even nations! A pathological case such as you are is a case-study in a psychiatric study, and not objects of civilized communication.

I shall not be replying or using this blog any more.

But will request the moderators not to allow anyone to insult religions, peoples as a race and countries. This is not freedom of speech; it is license to hurt people that should in any society worth its name attract actions under criminal laws guarding against defamation and libel.

Mahfooz

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".