For mahfooz and Arabian imperialism part quatre!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 1, 2006 at 18:24

My dear mahfooz and you must pardon me but I care less if you have a degree in English or not and I find your little game about dropping names of people that you know to be most amusing. And I care less to know who these people are. And you are wrong, Syro-Aramaic is not a dead language. The spoken language of Chaldeans in the Middle East and you guessed it is Syro-Aramaic. And yes the Qur'an has a lot Syro-Aramaic words and the locus classicus is Tur or jabal, oh I forgot that you know no Arabic but you can ask your Mullah.

As for my screen name: I like it and get over it!

And no I'm not a woman, or an Arab or even a Muslim. I have never been , god forbid, a Muslim but I know my Arabic very well, and still believe that the Qur'an is nothing but poor literature and a very violent book for sure.

You? you are and you must pardon me a wannabe Arab who have no regard for the suffering and brutalization of your ancestors by Islam and by Arabian Imperialism.

As for the word Bengal: In the language of your Allah it is al-Benghal as the letter G becomes the arabic ghain. But again this exposes your total ignorance of Arabic but it also speaks volumes for the fact that, yes, islam and the Arabs and their culture brutalized your ancestors but your _Benghali_ (notice that I'm using the Arabic ghain) language and therfefore culture is still there despite your Allah and his Arabic, as you wrote:

"Rasul e-Akram" Your benghali language comes across loud and clear. Now let me correct your foray in a language that you really do not know:

al-Rasul al-Karim (the noble prophet)

Notice that Arabs use the definite article al and Akram means _more_ noble but if so abul Qasim aka Muhammad was more noble than what? do you get it and do you see that your Arabic/Benghali is just poor?

Like I said: you are out to spread a religion that wants you to be an Arab. You are no Arab, you are a Benghali. Shame.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".