Our dear Terrence had no clue that there is indeed an Aristotelian KISS and what a fadiha or scandal

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 25, 2009 at 12:07

Our dear Terrence has been exposed that he does not do his home work before posting his pathetic blogs and indeed Aristotle's KISS is beyond him and his Allah and his rasul

>Now the pretentious Arab dhimmi has been caught out once again.

Would you like to change your mind now and tell the readers that the one that was "caught out (sic) once again" is you. "caught out" really? what on earth is that "out"? O Guru of the English language! what a fadiha. Hello: Your English syntax is bizarre. Do us a favor and stick to Urdu

> And he is making it worse by trying to find excuses and resorting to his usual Islam bashing abuses.

I do not bash Islam I only tell you what your Muslim sources tell us in Arabic a language that you cannot read speak or write right our dear Terrence al-tablighee?

>The issue is not what Aristotelian logic was discussed in Arabia 1400 years ago,

But it was in the sira and your Allah and his rasul and Gabriel were no match to those pesky Rabbis but it seems that and based on your Allah's response that he had no clue about this very simple fact and let me repeat it on emore time

The Aristotelian KISS is: a kiss performed using techniques solely from theoritical speculation untainted by any experiential data by one who feels that the latter is irrelevant anyway

Oh I cannot help it: O Mr Terrence Mr Terrence i dunnu them big English words

Oh let me see: you know that by Allah revealing surat al-ikhlas in respose to the Aristotelian KISS:" If Allah created this creation then who really created Allah" it means that your Allah and his rasul and you too have no clue about basic logic and you know what? you believe that an Arabian warlord and caravan raider spoke to an Arabian deity via an angel! Tsk...tsk...tsk... I can see Aristotle turning in his grave

>Aristotelian logic is still discussed today.

Really? by you? subhanallah! you had no clue that there was such thing as the Aristotleian KISS. Shame on you

> If you want to have a discussion on that start another thread and I will be only too happy to join in.

Join in what? Hello: you are boring

>That is not the point.

What point? The point is you are boring. You know what? let me ask you the question again: then who really created your Allah?

>You referred to KISS principle as being Aristotle's.

Well see above and you know what? you either put up or well you know the rest

>Where did you get that from?

Well you have the reference and it was to the point

>From your uncivilised Arab village.

You mean Mecca or is Madina?I need to let al-wahabiyuun know that a maskeen men el-hind aw el-bakistan or the poor one from India or Pakistan (and this is what your Arab masters call your likes) is saying that Mecca and Madina are uncivilized villages astaghfirullah al-3azeem and you will have a fatwat al-takfeer issued at the blink of an eye

> You have no idea of when Aristotle had his discourses

Oh "discourses" them big English words again. Subhanallah (oh darn it Arabic words again oh this one your Mullah should be able to tell you what it means if he knows Arabic that is)

O Guru of the English language can I add "discoorses' (oh darn it typo but again we have established that I'm in good company as Allah also makes mistakes in spelling in the Qur'an)

>and when the KISS principle came into being!

I'm not interested in discussing anything with you. I'm here to tell you that you are and you must pardon me boring

>You come to the west from your desert and expect us to swallow your ...

Berkina Fasso is in the west? I did not know that? may be west of Pakistan or is it India?

>! Aristotle's KISS, what a disaster!

Now you either put up or shut up

I urge you to abandon islam and revert to the religion of your Hindu ancestors

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".