For mahfooz and Arabian imperialism part quatre!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 3, 2006 at 07:24

My dear mahfooz I find it really very interesting when an old civilzation (like your Benghali civilization) defies the language and therefore the culture of the Arabs and their religion and I can see this in your little gem:

"Rasul e-Akram"

This is an interesting mix of poor grammatical Arabic and your native tongue Benghali (notice I'm using your Allah's Ghain as your Allah's G letter is vocalized as Jeem). I do see as: Old civilizations and in this case your Benghali language and therefore culture are not conjured away by Arabic or by Islam.

And then your total and poor command of Arabic in general and of Arabic vowels in particular is very clear in your:

"Khutabul wada"

I have seen desperate attempts by wannabe Arabs to transliterate Arabic but this must be the ultimate gem

So here is your lesson for today:

It Is: Khutbat al-Wida3.

I doubt that you got it.

What is next? Your next lesson will be Syro-Aramaic words in the Qur'an. As you stated my dear mahfooz that Aramaic is a dead language. Well, the Qur'an proves you wrong and you will discover that you are reciting as a hafiz words in the Qur'an that are very much Aramaic words. So much for a dead language and like I said: old civilizations are not conjured away not by the Arabs or their language.

Shame.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".