No Proof at all- But Bogus.

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Feb 8, 2008 at 22:48

1. So the word Israel does not mean the state of Israel...Humm....

But the State of Israel according to the Holy Bible fulfills the prophecy of Ezequiel 36-37 38-39 .and I totally bend my head and knees to the Holy Bible, not to the Koran...To me the Koran has no validity whatsoever, nor the self proclaimed "prophet" named muhamad...yet, his alter ego or the pagan god of the moon, corroborates its counterfeit nature.

NEXT,

2. You say you have proved....Humm...

I do not know what type of logic you have adopted, but to the moment, I do not see, according to the exposed arguments, any proof.

NEXT,

3. You say that the word Israel does not mean the state of Israel...Hummm

Yet, by coincidence" it occupies the same place.....Wow...

NEXT,

4. promised to Jacob....Only founded in 1948...Well, the proof forever of the land of Israel to Jews came much before that one named muhamad was even born...so your proof is bogus, taking in consideration the chronological parameter you have taken to expose "YOUR" proof.

NEXT,

5. Your Al Aqsa mosque was built over the destroyed second temple. It was done on purpose not only to erase the Judaic Culture, Existence and Right to the place. Of course, the last thing Muslim want is the world to know that and have in mind it. And, that's the reason why you fight for not having arqueologic research beneath…..

NEXT,

The Sacred Bible, along with Jesus (Blessed Be He and Gloria Be Upon Him and those who protect him), warn us about false Prophets…..This fact, along with Amina's thoughts about this thing, Islam, just proves to me that muhamad was a false prophet…Indeed, the most perfect expression of the anti Bible…

But, you do not have to agree with me and I respect your opinion, Issam.

Shalom…..

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".