Our dear Comprendre le Coran is chasing his tail! Truly pathetic

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 31, 2020 at 06:23

Our dear CLC is back and I wonder why!

>There are 2 types of inscriptions on the Dome of the Rock : the religious who built it, and the caliph Abd Al-Malik, who imposed them.

Dear Readers: Can anyone explain to me what on earth is our dear CLC talking about? I thought that the Qur'an is a literary disaster, this is even worse.

>The religious wrote their understanding of this moment (they changed years later !) to the Christians of Jerusalem, and the words of the caliph, who imposed them.

For the Nth time: The inscriptions of al-Masjid al-Aqsa are really polemics of the Non Trinitarian Syro-Arabic Christianity directed against Trinitarian (both Arabic and Syriac) Christianity in late antiquity.

>These last ones are the forerunners of islam, not the religious.

What last ones?

> Luxenberg says reality and stupidities.

Then if "Luxenberg says reality and stupidities" then you can prove him wrong with ease. Right Mr genius?. You will find his study of the inscriptions of al-Masjid al-Aqsa in "The Hidden Origins of Islam" pages 125-151 and the title of the study is: "A New Interpretation of the Arabic Inscription in Jerusalem's Dome of the Rock"

Now you can prove him wrong or make a fool of yourself! I suspect that you will make a fool of yourself! I will be waiting for your review with great anticipation

>Islam is a creation of the Abbassids, yes, but beguinning with Al Mamun in 813. The prophete is a creation of 819, used in court by haddith in 820 in Bagdad.

OK! Whatever!

>May God bless you ! ...

Is the God here is Allah? If yes then I do not do Allah!

PS: Dear Readers: This thread is supposed to be about "Is Jerusalem mentioned in the Qur'an?"! Go figure!

Last, Stay away from Islam our dear Comprendre le Coran!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".