Part trois: al-Tabari had no clue what is really al-masjad al-aqsa or al-masjad al-haram and you think that you know? You must be kidding

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 13, 2010 at 06:41

Our dear Clyde al-tablighee who seems to come back for more

>All as been already explained to you(many times) nothing more. You don't even understand I am NOT Hindu - can't get that VERY SIMPLE concept through to you - how can anything else get through to you - actually, your name sounds like from the Hindu religion and culture.Look up my surname.Carry on.NOTE - apparently, you are the ONLY reader, NOT able to comprehend it - what does that say- you judge.

I read this as

1. You cannot find the name of jerusalem in the Qur'an a book that you cannot read in Arabic because it is not written in Urdu

2. You cannot find the name of the subject in verse Q17:1 so the claim that the subject is Muhammad cannot be proven from the book of Arabian ignorance

3. You discovered that al-Tabari had no clue what is al-masjad al-aqsa or what is al-masjad al-haram

I urge you to leave islam and be free and oh get a life

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".