Islamic ignorance

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 25, 2010 at 06:40

Our dear Clyde the so called Lebanese and Episcopalian! Sobhanallah

>Oh Great and UNWISE one - type the following in your browser- do a search - yo shall come up on much, my y UNWISE one:al-Quds or Iliya or even Urshalim in the qura

why do I have to do this when I can read the Qur'an and kutub al-turath al-islami in Arabic something that you cannot do?explain it to us ya ayuha al-jahil al-kabeer!

>So let me help you:

And let me help you: If you pontificate about a subject in history then you should be able to support your point of view by reading the primary sources in their primary language and here are the primary sources

1. al-Qur'an

2. al-sira al-nabawiyya of Ibn Ishaq in Ibn Hisham's redaction sirat rasul allah

3. Kitab al-maghazi by al-Waqidi

4. al-Tabari's tafseer/ta'weel of al-isra' wa al-mi3raj

5. Muqatil's tafseer of Q17:1

6. Tarikh by al-Tabari

And you should be able to read the sources in Arabic

The following will not be accepted as evidence

1. My Mullah I mean my Imam told me so

2. Pakistani tendentious web sites

3. The moron Zakr Naik (ROTFL) said so

4. Ambassador Akbar Zeb said so

5. wikipedia gobbledygook written by lost tabl;ighees like you

Good luck

you will not find the words Iliya or al-Quds or even Urshalem in the Qur'an in Arabic

>THEN, provude PROOF of your incoherent reasoning, and, diatribe oh Great Unwise one.

how many times do I have to tell you that we kuffar do not have to provide you with any proof it is you that has to provide us with the proof how many times do I have to tell you but again delusions and ignorance invite more delusions and ignorance

You see our dear Clyde the fake all we kuffar can do is to examine the evidence as i did and tell you that kutub al-turath al-islami do not support your bogus claim

Now it is your chance to shine our dear Clyde al-tablighee oh I forgot that you are Lebanese and Episcopalian

What a fake

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".