Exposing blatant ignorance

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 19, 2014 at 07:47

Our dear GoD is really trying hard to prove that this time Mecca is mentioned in a "corrupted" book go figure

However. I will prove to the readers that there is no extant literary sources that come from al-Hijaz prior ro the rise of Islam not a thing

>established for mankind was that at Baccah [Baca]

In Arabic that you cannot read in Q3:96 here is the rasm

ببكة or B Baka

1. The B means in

2. Ba

3. K

4. A (ta marbouta is silent)

Which had to be edited b y the Ulama and what a disaster the Ulam edited the words of Allah and they edited it be adding a shadda above the letter kaf in other words they added a letter kaf and now we have

ببكّة

1. B means in

2. Ba

3. K

4. Ka

5. A (ta marbouta that remains silent)

What a disaster they edited Allah's words and how come Allah did not protect his own word you tell us

And the word is not even close to the Arabic word بكى or Baka which means weep unless the word Bakka means weep so is this what this word mean? Or did Allah had a cold when he revealed this little gem and in his nasal voice it became Bakka? Or did the scribes make a mistake as per babbling 3Aisha who used to breast feed the youth of Quraish and to cheat in Abul Qasim

Why the ignorance you tell me

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".