Hi Mansoor, Here you are! ISLAMIC RITUALS - POOR COPIES OF HINDUISM

Submitted by Proud Indian (India), Jun 10, 2008 at 10:52

Hi mansoor..

Whats up buddy? you are hiding here? there was no response to my posts so i thought your credits at the madrassa funded cyber cafe were exhausted! anyways.. like always and once again let me discuss your statement, you said-

"When Hinduism is researched ( IS IT ALLOWED IN ISLAM TO READ AN INFIDELS HOLY BOOK?? FAATWA ON YOU AGAIN!!!...the idol worshiping came so late in practice and without any proper authority.. Vedas the sacred Books of Hinduism never gave any information regarding Idol worshiping (WHERE DID YOU GET THIS ???)...but so called reformers of that time ( WHICH TIME??)...took advantage of the vulnerability of the followers' belief....Now we can see Hinduism as a foolish bunch of colorful but baseless rituals.."

let me see.. we revolve in a circular path around our dieties and statues.. ITS FOOLISH AND BASELESS? YOU REVOLVE AROUND A BLACK STONE COVERED IN A CHADDAR UNDER WHICH NOT EVEN YOUR FOREFATHERS HAVE SEEN.. YOU FIND OUR RITUALS FUNNY?

WE CHANT MANTRAS FOR PRAISING OUR DIETIES.. YOU FIND IT FUNNY? YOU HAVE AYAS AND VERSES TO SCARE AWAY JINNS AND PRAISE ALL MIGHTY ALLAH.. I GUESS THATS BASELESS AND FOOLISH..!

OUR SAINTS AND PRIESTS HAVE BEADS MADE OUT OF RUDRAKSHAS WHICH THEY USE FOR MEDITATION.. FUNNY? WELL I HAVE SEEN YOUR MULLAHS TWIRL ROSARY BEADS , I GUESS THATS BASELESS AS WELL!

WE HAVE THE WATER OF GANGES WHICH WE CONSIDER THE MOST HOLY OF ALL.. THATS FUNNY? I GUESS YOU MUST BE FINDING THE CONCEPT OF ZAMZAM FUNNY AS WELL! ( DHIMMI HAS ALREADY TOLD YOU WHAT ZAMZAM IS)

SHAME ON YOU FOR CLAIMING THAT HINDU RITUALS ARE BASELESS AND FOOLISH. NOW LET ME SEE HOW YOU SEE THE ABOVE CUSTOMS YOUR PERFECT RELIGION FOLLOWS.

A QUESTION FOR YOUR PERFECT RELIGION

WHY DO YOU NEED TO FACE THE MECCA WHILE YOU PRAY? ISNT ALLAH SUPPOSSED TO BE OMNIPRESENT? DO SEE US PRAYING IN ONE PARTICULAR DIRECTION? I GUESS THERE IS NO ANSWER TO THAT.. IF IDOLATORY IS BANNED N ISLAM THEN ISNT A ROCK WHICH YOU CALL AS KAABA A SYMBOL ? IDOL ? WHAT HYPOCRISY. WE WORSHIP BHAGWAD GEETA, PURAN & THE VEDAS, WHICH ARE PHYSICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF GODS WORDS. YOU FIND THAT FUNNY? HOW COME YOU ALSO HAVE A PHYSICAL SIGN REPRESENTATING ALLAHS WORDS CALLED AS KORAN?

THE CRESCENT MOON AND THE STAR REPRESENTS ISLAM. FUNNY WE HAVE "OM" WHICH SYMBOLIZES HINDUISM.. ISN'T THAT SYMBOLISM?

LET ME UPDATE YOU ON IDOL WORSHIPPING AND ISLAM'S HISTORY. AS A SCHOLAR OF ISLAM , YOU MUST BE FAMILIAR WITH THE IDOLS AT MECCA WHICH MOHAMMAD DESTROYED? DO YOU KNOW THAT IN PRE ISLAMIC ARABIA, THAT YOU NOW REFER TO AS AL JAHLYA, YOUR ARABIAN FOREFATHERS WERE GROSSLY PAGANISTIC, THEY WORSHIPPED THE 360 IDOLS AT THE KAABA, ONE IDOL FOR EACH CLAN. ALLAH WAS JUST ANOTHER IDOL WHICH BELONGED TO THE HASHIMITE CLAN WHICH YOUR MOHAMMAD BELONGED TO AND WORSHIPPED.

MO'S GRANDPA ( GOD BLESS HIS SOUL) WAS ONE OF THE CUSTODIANS OF THE 360 IDOLS ( YOUR PERFECT , IRREFUTABLE & UNCHANGED KORAN TESTIFIES THAT) IT MEANS MO WAS FROM A FAMILY OF IDOL WORSHIPPERS. WASN'T MO'S FATHER'S NAME ABDULLAH ? WHICH MEANS SERVANT OF ALLAH? IF MO INVENTED THE TERM ALLAH THEN WHERE DID HIS FATHERS NAME COME FROM? IT IS THEREFORE PROVEN THAT ALLAH MUST HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE 360 IDOLS . MO DESTROYED ALL BUT KEPT ONE I.E ALLAH NAMED AFTER HIS FATHER. WHICH IS NOW THE SUPREME BIENG ,. I HOPE SOMEONE LIFTS THE VEIL AND REVEAL THE STATUE UNDER THAT BLACK STONE..

MR MANSOOR.. I HOPE YOU STOP YOUR "RESEARCH " IN OTHER RELIGIONS.. AND DO SOME SOUL SEARCHING IN YOUR OWN..

ISLAMIC RITUALS ARE NOTHING BUT POOR COPIES OF OTHER RELIGIONS & MAINLY HINDUISM, THE RELIGION OF YOUR FOREFATHERS. LEMME HEAR YOUR WONDERFUL REPLY ON THIS ONE.

Yours Truly and certainly glad to see you again.

Proud Indian

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".