Our dear Salah Ali and Arabian imperialism

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 23, 2009 at 17:58

Our dear Salah Ali whosr ancestors the people of Mesopotamia were brutalized by islam and by the Hijazi Arabs and by Sunni Muslims and who lives among infidels for reasons unkown wrote

> Most of the problems in Pakistan and Egypt are motivated and fueled by the West.

Really? Ok and in the cae of Egypt could you tell me what are really these problems in Egypt that are "motivated and fueled by the West" ya ayuha al-falyasoof al-kabeer? I will be waiting for your answer with great anticipation

Oh Pakistan! So are you from Pakistan? Oh I see

>The Western attempt at forcing regime change or democracy or even masterminding war by proxy.. all that have contributed to bottlenecking and nipping any attempt at development in their very bud.

gobbeldygook. So you tell me what are really Egypt's problems that are "motivated and fuelled by the west" and what are they ?

>The attempt at Mahfouz's life was not carried out by a madman who does not represent Islam.

Really? and so are the 19 mass murderers that crashed planes in big buildings and in the process killed 3000 innocent human beings were not real Muslims! Right? so the likes of Mohamed Atta is not getting his boys of your Allah's little heaven? after all he really was not into virgins!Right?

Oh Muhammad your idol? he was no more than an Arabian warlord and caravan raider and a child molester! Oh my source? Ibn Hisham's redaction of Ibn Ishaq's sirat rasul Allah and al-waqidi's al-maghazi! You see I only quote kutub al-turath al-islami

>In the religion of Islam "killing a single man is tantaount to killing all human beings"

Really? Oh so could you provide me with the aya? as you shall our dear salahthe demagogue you will have a little surpise and if you know your Arabic why do you not provide us with the aya in Arabic too as some of us can read write and speak Arabic! Well Urdu? No islam is the religion of the Hijazi Arabs only

>You cannot judge Islam by single incident.

Really and What single incident is that? The destruction of the civilizations of the late antique period and the crimes of islam against humanity since then? or is it the brutaliztion of your own ancsetors our dear salah the wannabe Arab? Oh did i say wannabe arab well I said it after all your Allah says in Arabic

wa ma arsalna min rasulan ila bilisani qawmihi

Do you know what this means mr demagogue? It means that islam is the religion of the hijazi Arabs only and you ain't no Hijazi Arab

And how do we get to your Allah his share of the loot (Q8:41)? do you have his e-mail address?

>If that is the criterion, then shall we judge Christianity by the post reformation atrocities or by the Spanish Inspection, though these were unprecedented!?

Well let me see your claim is bogus and do you want to know why?

1. ayat al-sayf. Oh ayat al-sayf? Well may be you can ask your Mulllah to tell you what it says but I will be nice this time and it says iqtollo al-mushrikeen. There is no verse that is even close to ayat al-sayf in the NT and I'm not even Christian

2. So how can you reconcile ayat al-sayf with your above pablum of an aya that your quoted mr demagogue? Hint: al-nasikh wa al-mansukh and let me help you more ayat al-sayf would abrogate such aya of yours and how come you did not know that (see Hibatullah al-nasikh wa al-mansukh)? Could it be because and you mut pardon me you are ignorant? or could it be because you were hoping that we infidels have no clue but in this case and you must pardon me you would be lying, so which one is it?

3. The crusades and and your funny Spanish "inspection" (sic) and any other Christian atrocity were committed DESPITE of Christian teachings and not based on Christian teachings. I challenge you to provide me with any verse in the NT that would support your bogus claim and would be any close to ayat al-sayf

You are not even original shame on you

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".