|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Pity the sons-in-law of these Saudi women.Reader comment on item: Mahram Despotism vs. Saudi Women Submitted by M.D. (United States), Jul 20, 2009 at 20:55 The mahram law does not include the sons-in-law of the Saudi women. It's only the grandfathers, fathers, brothers, uncles, nephews, sons, grandsons that are mentioned. So the male-oppressed mother-in-law can wield her power and expunge her frustrations against men on these poor guys (the sons-in-law)! Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (54) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |