|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Now Our dear Girl admits that there is such thing as hadith breast feeding of the adult and as if we did not knowReader comment on item: Mahram Despotism vs. Saudi Women Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 1, 2009 at 07:00 Our dear Bill's girl how come you did not know before about this little: fadihat rida3at rida3at al-kabeer which was big news in the Middle East in the past two years? But I guess it is because you do not speak any Arabic right? >I happened to notice that it says 'Give him five drinks of your milk…' it does not say 'suckle him' How dare you judge a translation without knowing the original Arabic? shame on you. Now you provide us with the original Arabic and it is you darling that have to tell us what the Arabic text really says. We infidles can only sit and laugh at you >as all other hadeeths regarding the fosterage through suckling specifically mention some form of the word 'suckle'. Then such traditions use the word rida3a or breast feeding (root RD3) which means that hadith rida3at al-kabeer is for real and was not made up by us infidles >So, it could be that he is suggesting just that… give him milk, be it in a cup or bowl or other vessel, just as women today often pump their breasts to extract milk for babies to drink from a bottle. It also goes on to say that the wives of the Prophet considered this a special case for 'Salim alone'. So, this section is actually discrediting the suckling of older people! Darling: you see you cannot ponitficate about what a text says in a language that you cannot read or write or speak but again the Greek logic is beyond the Muslim mind So darling: would you breast feed an adult? a yes or no answer would do I urge you to abandon Islam and be free again
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (54) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |