|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Mahram Despotism vs. Saudi WomenReader comment on item: Mahram Despotism vs. Saudi Women Submitted by firozali A. Mulla (Tanzania), Jul 25, 2009 at 21:38 I refer to that as the law. The final law. The common law is that of the predecessor or what you term precedents, the past cases where the judge rolls his thumbs and thinks what to apply after the many bygones cases. What is the best fit? This is not in Islam. We have one the Quran. The kadhis and the courts based on these. Not being a Muslim and you living in the UK it is very difficult to explain this in simple English as both the Indian and Islam law are out from UK. India had the first laws that migrated to UK; the laws in UK are based on these laws modified. Read Law by Mulla The lawyer < he has four volumes and you will see a lot of the Indian precedent now polished Islam cannot be translated by you or I as we have scanty knowledge in Arabic. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (54) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |