Figment of a psychotic imagination, perhaps?

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Nov 14, 2012 at 20:18

"al-Tabari is indeed telling us that the word al-raheem as in fa3eel in this case is a strange construct and he believes it should be الرِّاحِم and not the very strange الرحيم. It is not me who is saying that it is al-Tabari that is saying that"

Yet if that ISN'T what you've invented . . . as previously - then you would have posted more extracts. . . which you have failed to do so . . . hence until proven other wise - you have made more nonsense up.

Same way . your diastrous attempt at translation - and the complete lies . But it was old stuff - I had already correcte d it . hence you lied DELIBERATELY.

How pathetic!

- - -

"And you know what? Muslims did not even get the meaning of this rahman wa raheem (and he ain't either one and you will find it in the Qur'an in 5:54 where Allah is supposed to be the loving and the beloved"

More old lies . he he . why would different words have bearing on this?

R H M is a bona fide Arabic root . pray which scholar is saying other wise .. do share your references . . . and evidence.

Else - it is ALL happening in your mind.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".