More strange fabrications!

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Nov 18, 2012 at 15:22

The silliness of this is shocking! Bism is 2 word compound . . . strangely you admit this . . . YET still attempt to cover up your earlier mistake . . . of claiming it is one word.

In dicitionary - you find 2 separate words . . . yet still claim it is one word. .. how idotic! Why the strange lies!

Bizarre - Is there something psychologically wrong with you?

- - -

You know our dear Amin who has no shame it is really stupid to use an English language dictionary to tell us what an Arabic word means right?

Whereas the "Receipt" is an English word . . . and not an Arabic word. So when asked to define what a receipt is - naturally one uses English.

However definition of something, especially physical objects is independent of language. What a paper receipt is - would be same in all language.

This is a ... bare-faced lie. Nothing more.

- - -

"It is also stupid to tell us what is and is not a Syriac word right?"

What an odd and nonsenical thing to say . . . why would that be "stupid"?

- - -

"And it is really stupid to tell us that the word istilam means paper receipt when it is not right? "

Well - it isn't me saying it is it? It is the dictioanries - namely: Hans Wher, Al Mawrid, Al Maany - Also Google and Babel Online Translators. I am just quoting them. Hence it is REALLY stupid to say opposite to them . . . especially without a single reference!

- - -

"It is really stupid when you tell us that you earned not one but three degrees an 'ancient" Arabic"

Another lie! As I have never said anything of the sort.

- - -

"Now this time it is even worse: So you me ask you a question: Is the Qranic word Bism one or two words? Hint: It is one word"

Says who? What authority? Again - no sources - just lying claims. . . . that you repeat over and over . . . and that is all.

It isn't - Bi-Ism is two words - compound of particle Ba and the word Ism.

- - -

"Now go and tell one of your Arab masters is the word Bism is two words and they will laugh at you"

He he! Here is the ridiculous lie . . . so which Arab is saying that Bism is ONE word . . . . one single credibile reference?

See how open and ridiculous and really idiotic your lies are?

- - -

"Now are the words B'ism (Arabic for in the name of) and Bishm (in Syriac for in the name of) one or two words? You tell me! Hint: One word. And where would you find the word Bism in HW you tell me?"

Bism of Arabic is two words . . . Ba [Preposition] and Ism [Noun]

There is no word . . . Bism in HW - obviously as it is 2 word compound.

- - -

This points to that I am right - Ism is one word - Ba the other . . . you admit it:

"So what is the root of the word? Hint: you look for the SM (the very old semitic root for name and we are not looking for the word sem or poison) and not ISM and even HW directs you to where to look so for wannabe arabs like you if you look under Ism you will find on page 17B that it tells you: SEE SM. et voila you will not find it in HW under the A's but under the S's so with your poor education because you will not find it under the A's this means that there is no such word right? But it exists and you will find it on page 427A UNDER the S's and not under the A's right? And you know why is the root here not ISM any guesses? Hint: Because the Arabs use the real semitic root here

How about the letter B in both Arabic or Syriac if it is before such root SM? Hint: it would mean IN (the)....of and for this see page 38A in HW"

Look how strange, idotic, fallacious and lying your responses are . . . . in the above you ADMIT Bism is 2 words . . .

yet still "hint" that it is ONE word then . . . . attempt this strange lie:

"Now are the words B'ism (Arabic for in the name of) and Bishm (in Syriac for in the name of) one or two words? You tell me! Hint: One word. And where would you find the word Bism in HW you tell me?"

Wow! This takes the biscuit!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".