The rule of the Arabs in their only civiiaztion was marginal at best

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 21, 2012 at 11:20

Our dear Hava who ain't hava and he ain't a Bishoy included this in his source that he never read as his source tell us that Maimonides was Muslim which is bogus because he was Yahoodi or Jewish now this time he tells us

In many ways, they were replicating the same process of translation of knowledge that the great translators like Hunayn Ibn Ishaq had done at the House of Wisdom 350 years earlier in Baghdad

Bogus if you would have taken the time to check your bogus post that you did cut and paste but not read you will have realized that Hunein Ibn Ishaq was not Muslim he was Nusrani or Christian and he was indeed Nestorian

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunayn_ibn_Ishaq

Now you tell us how come you did not know that?

See what happens when you post drivel that you did not even read and it is posted by other lost tablighees like you

For the readers: without the likes of Hunein Ibn Ishaq the Nestorian Christian there would have been no islamic learning as he was one of those that translated the Greek learning from Greek to Syriac and then to Arabic

Our dear Hava's who ain't no Hava Arab masters? they were to busy looting and raping and killing and destroying the great empires of the late antiquity

See what happens when you post this our dear Hava who ain't no Hava?

I urge you to leave islam after all your Allah says that islam is the religion of the Hijazi Arabs only so do you want to disagree with Allah astaghfirullah?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".