69 million page views

Cannot Dismiss Syria Altogether - With or Without al-Assad

Reader comment on item: Criticisms of the U.S.-led Air Campaign against ISIS
in response to reader comment: Assad's dictatorship not really the problem

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Oct 3, 2014 at 16:01

To a truth, the last assertion, '[i]f [al]-Assad is removed from power, I can almost guaranty that his replacement will be worse,' for every regime that underwent their own 'Arab upheaval,' all have found themselves compromised in one fashion or another, the distinction of al-Assad's being it is the most resilient, a peculiarity that has many stumped, especially the current American Administrative Chief Executive; or so we are led to believe.

That being said; what should be the focus versus what else is being missed as the loss of focus appears to be the issue?

For the immediate observations, Syria is in a shambles, whether one thinks al-Assad is at fault or otherwise; his overreaction to the initial rebellion has taken this regional scrap to a place al-Assad cannot recover intact from; and his outside patronage appears to understand that. Even if the ISIS/ISIL/IS threat is dealt with, Syria will never be the same, whether the current regime remains or not.

Elimination of countering political opposition as mentioned is indeed the mantra that is undercurrent in what is happening, as it has been for empire making from the ancient times. But which make empire building more difficult these days is that arms sales knows no allegiance except the prevailing currency exchange rate and more bang for the buck. ISIS/ISIL/IS solved its immediate requisitions for munitions by expropriating them; but this may have its limits.

What in the beginning was a difficulty of target confusion (from the White House-Islam is a religion of peace) to a belated response to a situation reeling out of control altogether, what is the ultimate targeting and sought after achievement in the attempts to quell the most potentially upsetting Arab conflict since the 1973 attacks against Israel? For some, dispelling ISIS/ISIL/IS's threat in the Fertile Crescent is a hard one to get any focus on. What is being missed here?

Actually, there is a possible motive in all of this; and ISIS/ISIL/IS has already made the point, not only in the Fertile Crescent, but around the world. We are already here and you appear to us to be impotent to stop it anytime soon. If a better coalition can be cobbled together to address the threat to the local regional issues, when that thins out, who else is arriving to pick up the pieces? By this time, al-Assad's weakened position may end up even more untenable and who remains to fill that vacuum – Erdoǧan? Hmmmm.

But let us interject a perspective made by others, that in the background are found compelling connections of interested parties (some suggest Iran; others Russia); and what elements of influences that those powers may bring to complicate and already confusing situation. Indeed, part of te issue the United States has a couple of years ago was the appearance of a waffling American Administration that said things were seriously Syrian, but a limited response that proved ineffective was the best that could be offered.

The question for the moment: do we or do we not intentionally or unintentionally assist al-Assad; and what do we do when that fails without a plan B? From a targeting perspective, al-Assad might appear inconsequential at this point and therein lays the conundrum; what if he does go and a new paradigm arrives to complicate things further, what does the world expect to happen then? Identify the real target and then recalculate the matrix for the intentions of a worldwide catastrophe, al-Assad notwithstanding.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (31) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Atrocious Islamic "Palestinian" Har-Nof synagogue massacre (18.11.14) [204 words]MalkaJun 30, 2022 00:24282878
The Problem Is Islamic Terrorism [88 words]Tom DundeeOct 27, 2014 09:19218989
no boots policy meant to motivate [39 words]JebBSep 30, 2014 17:35218349
Response to no boots on the ground [59 words]Stephen H. ChopekOct 2, 2014 14:32218349
Airstrikes alone wont do the job ! [49 words]Stephen H. ChopekSep 29, 2014 18:37218311
The Initial Strategy [80 words]Barry BlackOct 1, 2014 10:01218311
1Footmote in history? I don't think so... [120 words]saraOct 1, 2014 21:16218311
A Brave New World? [64 words]Barry BlackOct 2, 2014 11:03218311
2Again, I disagree with your definition ... [206 words]saraOct 2, 2014 21:35218311
2Obama's pro-Iran sympathies [193 words]Dean M.Sep 29, 2014 16:44218309
Ad hominem attacks have no place on a Daniel Pipes blog [76 words]RAYMOND TANTERSep 30, 2014 22:19218309
Keeping the eye on the ball: Iran [116 words]Dean MOct 1, 2014 22:29218309
Saudi oilfields [36 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ECAWSep 29, 2014 13:28218307
Saudi oilfieds [43 words]ECAWOct 2, 2014 02:31218307
1there is an option [82 words]servet cevikSep 29, 2014 02:14218302
Criticisms of the U.S.-led Air Campaign against ISIS [63 words]Tony WilsonSep 28, 2014 19:02218292
All about jobs [158 words]MIchael S.Oct 5, 2014 09:08218292
A Critque of the criticisms [374 words]Cyril ChilsonSep 28, 2014 18:54218291
Peacw [16 words]An ordinary womanJun 13, 2016 15:58218291
1The Kurdish factor: Russian tanks via Iran could be a game-changer. [170 words]Michael S.Sep 28, 2014 18:51218290
the US should act like a super power [359 words]mythSep 28, 2014 18:30218289
destroying oil production is now certainly a mistake [29 words]mythSep 28, 2014 17:47218287
U.S.and Isis. [18 words]JanaSep 28, 2014 17:35218286
LET THE ARABS FIGHT THE ARABS [262 words]Ilene RichmanSep 28, 2014 17:17218284
The Obligation of American Exceptionalism. [208 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
EthanPSep 28, 2014 16:32218282
ISIS Beheadings Unhinge People [73 words]DaveSep 28, 2014 16:31218280
Search for moderates [27 words]Ann Luppi von MehrenSep 28, 2014 13:56218276
Assad's dictatorship not really the problem [82 words]Michael S.Sep 30, 2014 20:43218276
Cannot Dismiss Syria Altogether - With or Without al-Assad [577 words]M. ToveyOct 3, 2014 16:01218276
1Turkey's next steps in Syria and elsewhere [677 words]Michael SOct 10, 2014 17:06218276
Great analysis [30 words]saraOct 10, 2014 21:03218276

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)