As For Turkey and NATO -Who is Really in Control

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jun 14, 2018 at 14:03

As can be seen in the side bar discussions this observer has with others elsewhere in this forum of how the Middle East is being transformed and prepared for the actions being contemplated and prosecuted by Turkey's Erdoǧan, such as the fifth column activities in the Arab sectors of Israel; and the key to discussing those antipathies Israel is facing must center on why such antipathies are continuing to be fomented in places that really should have nothing to do with Israel; but Israel's antagonists continue to butt in anyway.

Israel is still being prepared. Why, many ask? If, for no other reason, it is because it is Israel, a land that so many love to hate and for reasons one must delve into the religious realm of philosophies of the history of empires in order to understand. Too few even want to try that approach, trying instead to come up with a mortal human rationale to justify giving Israel a hard time in their own ideologies.

This observer has made notice of such things in the way the history of Israel is reflected in her Holy Writ; and the fulfillments in history that give credence to Israel's existence and the baffling way how that occurs in contrariness to the world's intention of minimizing how Israel thwarts empires along the way. In this moment, Turkey is in a process of magnifying itself against Israel and the responding ways the other malefactors against Israel are in concert with those actions. It fits in with current Biblical precepts perfectly. See Zephaniah and Zechariah. But wait for what happens when Turkey get in too deep: that's next...and watch what NATO is unable to do about it...

That's in the point to be made as to Who in the other discussion is really in control......

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".