New Policy of Dissembling New American Motives in Middle East Policies

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), May 21, 2021 at 18:43

In viewing the slight of diplomatic handling in the recent 'cease-fire' between Israel and the terrorist Hamas organization's trumped up provocation after the Ramadan rage over the Temple Mount, the speculation persists regarding what is still not being revealed as to why Israel was compelled to stop when obviously there were still efforts to try and get Hamas deeper into Israeli territory. Why the pause?
The American 46th Administrative Chief Executive's motives are unsure and unseen; as Paul Harvey would have investigated (certainly not the attitude of the current American media), what is the rest of the story? Israel would not have pulled the punch unless something was not true in the cease-fire prospect.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".