Campaigning For 46th American Administrative Chief Executive Still

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Dec 3, 2021 at 17:30

Maybe, the progressive press are signaling they know something that they think was a fait accompli, but not really: that the current American Chief Executive's office is not what they think it is: do they still need comfort they successfully pulled it off? If they still need to cover for the apparent inefficiencies of governance every time the Chief Executive is displayed, they signal something is not right. The rest of the 'political community' already know that the current administration cannot deliver on the least of the security issues, let alone internal policies; thus the need for seeking votes of confidence where none are apparent amongst the electorate. They were not trusted, after all, when the computers did not trust them either.
It is why their voices must be stifled. When does true governance kick in to still the raucous voices of dissent. If the United States cannot get its own house in order, what makes anyone think that voices of reason are going to convince hostile noises in the Middle East not to permit nuclear ambitions from exploiting the ME?
The 46th American Administrative Chief Executive has been attempting to give an impression of policy control, but the inconsistencies shown on the podium are defeating such intents with contradictory results from implementation of inconsistent requirements from variable government sources.
If this continues into the upcoming election cycle, who is anyone going to believe anything is fixable, let alone going back to the previous normal? Campaigning then will be impossible.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".