questions to Richard

Submitted by G.Vishvas (India), Mar 26, 2008 at 04:50

has it really protected women?

have muslim men not used the idea of being guardians/protectors of women to suppress them and vilify them in allah's name if they reject the male dominance, arrogance and wichtigtuerei?

is the women supposed to or allowed to show her beauty and embellishments to her father, son, brother, father-in-law, nephews, slaves, eunuchs, children etc.?

is a man, being a man, automatically worthy of receiving obedience from a virtuous woman?

being deprived of the sight of women and feminity has caused muslim men to be very aggressive, frustrated and perverse (like a dog kept always in chain becomes more vicious and aggressive and incapable of restricting himself when left free). muslim men are indeed the most involved in cases of rape, molestation, ill and filthy talk about women, misogyny etc.

a woman has the right to reject man's authority, dominance and tricks and a religion which does not allow that safely is not fit for the 21st century.

The kuran is not a book of any unique or singular superior guidance or knowledge, but a book of manipulation through intimidation and seductions so that muslim men become angry perverse bloodthirsty warriors for islam and muslim women become pleasure-givers and house maids for these warriors and reproduction machines for the ummah (= muslim community).

have you started noticing that in Germany/Europe now? Or not yet? Or you want to remain blind to these glaring facts? are they too glaring that they blind you?

with so many timid or opportunistic non-muslims licking the boots of the agents and quislings of islam the muslims will have it easy to take over non-muslim lands and set up their islamofascist regimes - first in pockets and then all over.

tolerance is a good thing, but not when it is practised towards a fascist ideology like islam. islam pretends to be a religion and then misuses the privileges accorded to a religion for pushing forward fascism in the name of a so-called god.

a muslim women has no choice but to praise islam and its repressions (calling them protections) because if she dares criticize islam then her life will become worse than what it already is. this is typical of fascist ideologies - the victims prefer to praise the repressive ideology in public because they know if they don't then they will have to suffer even more.

your socio-political intelligence is underdeveloped. please do something about it.

god is a man-made abstraction - to obey god means very often in reality to obey some fascist trickster who claims to know god and god's "will and instructions". this criticism is not valid equally for all religions and all god-concepts - but it is very much valid for islam (=submission=mental slavery). the very word "islam" means mental slavery. did you ever think about that?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".