1st proof THAT dhimmi has no knowledge of Arabic

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Oct 31, 2011 at 06:00

I have said this previously AND iwll say it now - the DICTIONARY does NOT make one expert in the sciences of language.

You have to learn GRAMMAR to be able decipher a language. Especially one as different from Arabic.

Arabic classifies certain nouns as Shibah Fail - Similars to a verb .... including Masdars, Active & Passive Participle - Ismul Fail wa Mafool. As they have similar actions as

Second if you had BOTHERED to read (oh wait you cannot) then you would have GOT to the answer. After all YOU gave then you would have got to the answer:

إذا حذف الفعل وبقي المصدر، نشأ معنى لم يكن لينشأ لولا الحذف(4). فمن ذلك أنْ تريد:

- إلى الأمر مثلاً، فتحذف الفعل فتقول: [رَمَلاً](5).

- أو إلى النهي، فتحذفه فتقول: [رَمَلاً لا عَدْواً](6).

- أو إلى الدعاء، فتحذفه فتقول: [سقياً لوطني].

- أو إلى التوبيخ، فتحذفه فتقول: [أَلَعِباً، وقد جدّ الناس؟!](7).

- أو إلى تفصيلِ عاقبةٍ، فتحذفه فتقول: [أقْدِمْ: فإمّا النصرَ وإمّا الشهادةَ(8)].

Mutalkim is Ism-ul Fail.

It was better you hadn't gone down this route ...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".