More deobandi tablighee delusions

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 29, 2011 at 15:01

More comedy from our dear Amin who told us before that the reference that he was provided with is a childrens' book or did you forget? Now you are using the chidldren's book as a refrence. I see

>... - then why have you failed to answer that KATHIRAN by itsels is mafool mutlaq.

Oh so al-maf3ool al-mutlaq is not your bogus haqiqa any more I see

>The line is NOT akala aklan kathiran -

What line?

>rather akala kathiran is used. Kathiran is a mafool mutlaq.

No it is not and you tell your help that he is jahil kabeer

>Same way so is Haqiqatan.

So haqiqa is a maf33ol mutlaq or is it zarf as you claimed? make up your mind

It was me who gave you the example.

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/190270

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/190328

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/190355

What examples?

Ha ha ha -

I read this as you have no clue right?

> your OWN LINK proves this is not the case. Did the following simply go over your head:

>Here is a passage - going more into detail of what a mafool mutlaq is .

Let me see from the source that you called a children's book i see

أوّلاً - أنْ يُحذَف:

يُحذَف المصدر (المفعول المطلق) في حالات شتّى. لكنها على اختلافها وتنوعها، يحكمها ضابط واحد. هو أنّ المصدر - وإن حُذِف - يظلّ في الكلام ملحوظاً مُلتَمَحاً، ودونك البيان:

رجع القهقرى = رجع رجوعَ القهقرى

أكل كثيراً = أكل أكلاً كثيراً

Did you understand what the text says? let me guess you have no clue yuhdhaf al-masdar or al-maf3ool al-mutlaq in many situations and akal akala kathir equals akal kathir which means ... that the word that hudhifat is the second word which is akla which is al-maf3ool al-mutlaq ...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".