A quick summary

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Dec 26, 2011 at 20:17

I have answered this ... but I do NOT control when my answers are posted.

Let me summarize:

You do not understand the Arabic language.

You present a judgement of Arabs - then call Arabic weak - and this your argument. Which is illogical argument. Because to call Arabic weak - you need linguistic evidence for it being weak.

You have no knowledge about Arabic - and you have not read a single book about it.

You have very little knowledge about Arabic - you do not even know what language they speak.

You formed your ignorant view first about Arabic - then tried to find evidence - all you came up was a few wiki and other references - talking about

Then you claimed "presumption" on those basis that Arabic is weak.

You have found no academic support at all - and you in your stupidity - you tried to dismiss that all Academics/Scholars are prejudiced - which is a strange and stupid view. Because then you do a U-turn and claim evidence and give few website addresses - such as wiki the fact book. Why?

You give an analogy of "poor tools" - yet you do not know why Arabic is a poor tool - for the analogy to work one has to have knowledge for comparison analysis - yet you openly say you have no knowledge of Arabic.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".