Whinning for West

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Dec 29, 2011 at 18:30

And Arabic is weak on what basis.... repeatedly asking you to prove it - not a single Academic or otherwise any support at all. And in your STUPIDITY - you declared all Academia - to be biased. Really!

Then you have told several lies - which I proved - with evidence where you have clearly changed your story. A proven liar. Yet do you have an answer - why you choose to lie?

You are the person - who even admits to know nothing about Arabic - yet has a views borne out of hate and ignorance. Well you have shown your true colours of hate now with this post haven't you. I said from start - you have nothing more than ignorance and prejudice.

-----

I warned you - popular books usually do not make good literature. Who is better and worth more - in literature.... Mahfouz or Rowling. Oh that one is easy....

-----

Then you started the lie of so called Arabic classic - even in the original post I had given you the evidence - yet you STILL choose to lie over it.

and this is evidence how:

http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2010/01/18/100118crbo_books_pierpont#ixzz1hsdCiSTb

What you did a quick Google search? This shows absolutely nothing.

-----

... It is clear you lost the argument long time ago.... oh you never had an argument. No one supports you.... And when there is nothing left in the tank.... abode of the ignorant - Petty Insults.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".