Terrorist

Submitted by steven L (United States), Jan 9, 2015 at 16:44

Why should the respective Governments, of the countries who harbor known terrorists or potential terrorists, wait for them to commit more acts of violence. Why not prevent by preempting? Does the "liberty" of committing crimes or terror acts supersede the right of life of peaceful citizens?

For those who want to impose self-restrain, it means the death of freedom. That is exactly what the Islamists count on. What is freedom if you can't use it or express it?

The Islamists will impose their unlimited will (their freedom) upon you.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".