Our dear Asma PhD and gem time

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 2, 2010 at 07:36

Our dear Asma PhD is repeating the same nonsense we hear from lost tablighees like him. Oh did i say him? Oh well

>I just browsed through your email, and yet again I find someone, with no sense of research breaking down the Quranic verses and dwelling on every single word...

And I just browsed through your e-mail darling and yet again I find more Islamic drivel as you shall see

>Without Thinking Or Reasoning.. The Quran has ordered us to Think and Reason

Darling:You think and you use reason ? masha'allah

>with every verse and everything in our life. (there are hundreds of verses that ask us to think, see, reason, use common sense etc). Definately many more than the few verses on battle and war.

gobbledygook

... we do not even know what surat al-anfal or for this matter what the Qur'an really says

>You need a researcher's mind to know the message of Quran.

You are a researcher darling when you cannot even read the Arabic language? sobahanallah

So you read the Qur'an in let me guess: Urdu? But it is Quranan 3arabiyyan and not Quranan Urdian so stick to Urdu darling

>All the verses in the Quran relating to war or battle were revealed to the Prophet pbuh when a battle/war was forced upon him By Those Who Only Wanted To Fight Him For His Religious Belief. I am trying to make two points out of this:

More gobbeldygook

>1. Know the History of the Verse.

No you do not. You only know what the Ulama told us 300 years after the death of Abul Qasim and you know what? the Ulama had no clue not back then or now what this opaque revelation called al-Qur'an is really saying

But again Aristotle is beyond the Muslim mind

And do we know the history of any verse in the Qur'an? Let me help you: We do not even know what the Qur'an says so darling is it maaliki or is it maliki in suart al-fatiha for the rasm of the word MLK? Let me guess: you have no clue about what I'm talking about right ?

So how could you know sabab al-nuzul for any aya when we are not even sure what the Qur'an is really saying and here is another example so in Q3;120 is it yadirkum (Cairo Qur'an) or is it yadurrumum (Tunisian Qur'an) so which one is it ?

For the readers: Our dear Asma PhD is pontificating about what a book is saying in a language that he I mean she cannot read! And the above examples that I provided are from the Cairo Qur'an and the Tunisian Qur'an where we have different reading of same words with very different meaning

Now do you get it our dear Asma al-tablighee? As for the bogus asbab al-nuzul or the bogus pakistani "context" thing: Let me give you an example so in surat al-tahreem was there really a Mariyya al-Qibtiyya as we are told by al-Tabari and Ibn Ishaq or did Abul Qasim eat 3asal nahl as we are told by Ibn Kathir and this is why we have this little drama in Abul Qasim's little abode so which one is it darling? And how can we believe your bogus context thing when the ulama back then had no clue what this opaque revelation called al-Qur'an and a book that you cannot read in Arabic is saying?

Shame on you

>The time and circumstance it was revealed in (that's your research which will help you Think and Reason with that verse).

You mean the made up asbab al-nuzul? Oh I forgot you do not know any Arabic but that does not stop you from pontificating about a language that you cannot read speak or write!

>The verse i spoke of earlier was revealed when the Battle of Badr was upon muslims. The Meccans had waged that battle (not the muslims).

Did you ever hear of the Aristotelian KISS darling? Well I guess with your little PhD you should know that you cannot reach any conculsions about what a book is saying in a language that you cannot read speak or write. So go and learn Arabic first ...

I urge you to abandon islam and read a real book shame on you

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".