Our dear Deb and the etymologies of the words masr,Hindu and Syria

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 4, 2010 at 07:17

Muslimkush wrote

>>"I meant to suggest that Temple Mount was destroyed after invention of so called religion called islam"

He is right as to be able to built a cultic center for the then emerging Islam there will be destruction of older buildings on the site and this is what Abd al-Malik did in 692CE but the real questions for our dear Deb are:

1. Why does al-masjad al-aqsa look like a Byzantine Chruch? Any guesses?

2. And why would the first cutlic center in Islam be built in distant Jerusalem and not in miserable Mecca? Unless the Umayyads were really local Syrian Arabs and that islam really has nothing to do with Mecca or a Muhammad or even an Allah?

3. And why would the Umayyads establish their capital in Damascus and not in Mecca? Any guesses?

4. And the inscprtion in al-masjad al-aqsa: Muhammadan rasul allah that this Muhammadan here is really the blessed and this blessed in Syrian Christianity was really the Christ and not that fictional Muhammad the Arab? And what Abd al-malik was providing was no more than the understanding of Christian Arabs (which the Umayyads were) of the Christ?

So Congratulations our dear deb but it seems that the Muhammadan here is the Christ and that Christ is your rasul

It is not me who is saying that it is the Umayyads

I will be wiating for your answers with great anticipation

>My Answer : Do you even know what Temple mount is ?

You know we kuffar say ask a stupid question and you will get a stupid answer so you tell us what is the temple mount?and we will be watching you making a fool of yourself

>Do you know which Jewish prophet made it ?

So what is his name? and which hand did he use to build it? and did he rest or is he like your Allah does not take a break?

>Do you even know what is meant by the word Jew ?

So what does the word Jew really mean? I will be watching you making a fool of yourself again

But here is my help the word Jew or Hebrew comes from the Semitic root 3BR

>If you do not then why you spout hatred ?

The one who spouts hate is a deity that comes from Arabia who calls his own creation the Jews khanazeer wa quruud oh the Arabic? darn it I do not translate Arabic for wannabe arabs like you

And you know what? You must be wondering sometimes why would your Hindu ancestors convert to a foreign religion that comes in a language that they cannot speak read or write you tell us mr ignorant

Then Muslimkush wrote

>"It is rediculous to suggest that arabs named Hindustan,which has been there for 5772 years"

Well let us see what is really the etymology of the word Hindu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

So it seems that Muslimkush is correct as the word comes from old Persian (and not from post Arab invasion Persian) via Vedic Sanskrit Sindhu

Now let us watch our dear Deb making a fool of himself

>My Answer : Do you even know the meaning of the word "Hindustan" ?

Enlighten ya ayuha la-falyasoof al-kabeer!

>Do you even know that the word "Hindu" was coined by the Muslims to refer to the people on the Indian side of Indus ? If not then seriously read your history.

Wrong. No it was not. It is OLD PERSIAN mr ignorant and how come you did not know that? And I have a few questions for you

1. How come your Allah is silent about al-Hind and about Hinduism and Buddhsim? Could it be because he is an Arab that does not know anything beyond Arabia?

2. And do you know what these Arabic words mean? al-hindusi wa al-hindusiyuun, al-hind, al-hindi wa al-hunuud? you are ignorant and shame on you

>And even if the term Hindu is of islamic origin then why should we be surpirsed after all the Greeks are the ones that should be given the credit for the name of one of the countries of your masters the Arabs and that is Syria

And a more interesting example is Egypt

1. The Greeks called Egypt Aigyptos and called Egyptians aigyptios

2. Your Allah and his rasul called Egypt Masr and the Egyptians are al-masriyuun

3. But wait if we read the islamic historical tradition we read about Bilad al-qibt and qibti and aqbat or the country of the copts and the copts and the copt as in mariyya al-qibtiyya and you know what? If your rasul is re-incarnated and comes back to earth he would have no clue about what is really bilad al-qibt and the copts and do you know why? I'm glad that you asked and for this see number 4

4. Well the Arabs or more likely than not the Egyptians arabized the Greek name for Egyptians into Qibt or Copts

5. But you know what? Egyptians called their country KMT or Kemi and called themselves 'enremenkemi

6. Now Muslims in Egypt have no clue that they are really Muslim Copts and do you know why? Because islam get you to hate your past and the only proud people in Egypt today are the Copts or the Christians of Egypt as they love their past and do not want to have any link with the Arabs or with arabia or Arabian imperialism

Now did you learn something new ?

>And tell me from where you get the fact that "Hindustan" was there for 5772 years ?

Yes it was and so was masr and so was Syria

> If you know about Ramayan and Mahabhartha , then you should be able to know that there is no mention of the words "Hindu" or "Hindustan" in any of these epics.

So? And there is no mention of the word Masr in Egyptians inscriptions so what?

>There is no mention of the word "Hindustan" in any of the pre-Muslim Indian literature. So it is very clear who coined the term "HIndustan". It was the Muslims who did it.

So what?

>If you make silly comments in this forum without knowing facts then you will be considered a moron.

No the silly comments come from you and someone who does not know facts like you can be considered a moron (as in not knowing what the word extant really means) right our dear deb as theses are your words

I urge you to abandon Islam and be free again

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".