If Jefferson was indeed a "faggot" then he was in good company

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 21, 2010 at 06:58

Our dear Deb has no evidence to provide us with evidence to support his ridiculous claims about Thomas Jefferson right our dear deb so he is changing the subject and telling us that he was a "faggot" a word that I have not heard in a long time

"Hello: Stop this tablighees Jeffy: His name is not Jeffy"

>My Answer : Hey DNM why do you bother about a long dead biggot like that Tommy Jefferson.

And his first name is not Tommy either

>OK if you do not like me calling him Tom Jeffy let me call him "Jef the old Faggot". Will that do for Yankees like you ?

Oh and speaking of "faggots" we are told in kutub al-turath al-islami the following

1. Muhammad had sex with a 9 year old child when he was 53 years old. We call this pedophilia so would you allow your 9 year old daughter to marry a dirty old man of 53 who has 22 wives and concubines? Just a yes or no answer would do

2. We are also told that Muhammad was a cross dresser (gasp!)

3. We are also told that he was gay or "faggot" (gasp!)

Oh should we call him "Mo the old faggot and cross dresser and child molester" what do you think?

Oh my reference? here are two old posts of mine with links to Zakaria Botros episode 75 but you can also watch episodes 76, 77, 78

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/161610

but darn it you do not know any Arabic and for this I provide you with a link to jihad watch and with a translation

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/161755

So it seems that if Jefferson was indeed gay (and It would not make any difference to me) he would be in good company as your so called prophet was also gay

And if you do not like what your islamic sources are telling us about Mo's sexuality then destroy them and good riddance

>Hey why are you skipping the real question ?

What question?

> I have given you proof like that letter from "Jef the old Faggot" which tells you that guy wanted Indians out of their lands so that his followers can occupy and colonize those lands.

No he did not. The real issue was the ownership of the land that it should be by individuals and it should not be a collective ownership now do you get it Mr ignorant?

>Now as a "rational" and "hisotry" orineted person , it is your job to counter my point and save the skins of your good old tommy guy.

Did you read my response to you? Hello: he believed that ownership of land should be by individuals and it should not be by the community as our native people did. He did not plan any killings of Indians and I challenge you to prove me wrong

>That letter is responsible for creating the attitude which led to the "Indian removal act" passed by US congress in 1830.

Then like a man write a paper and prove your point. ...

>My Answer : I have given you proof about the inspiration from old Jef the Faggot with that letter as an example which led to people like Andrew jackson creating the Indian removal act in 1830. It is upto you now to prove me that "Indian removal act" was not meant to take over Indian lands. Can you take that challenge ?

I read this as: you have no evidence

Hello: like a man write a paper or are you that lazy?

After all it is he who has a claim is the one that must provide the evidence we can watch you making a fool of yourself again and again

and here is your home work

1. Prove that Jefferson was a "faggot"!

2. Write a narrative with references about his rule in the treatment of our native people

And you will be making a fool of yourself again

>As I have said again and again I have already been proving to the readers here (those readers who can think and analyze)

You are ignorant

>that I am here to prove to the world what kind of mass murdering ideology this American exceptionalism is and I tell you Americans need to get rid of this scrap called "American exceptionalism" once and for all !!! The world wants the end of American exceptionalism and I will do anything to ensure that it is destroyed once and for all into oblivion.

Oh you are still sore that you did not get a green card right?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".