More islamic ignorance

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 3, 2010 at 18:14

Our dear Deb has no clue what is really extant historical evidence

Who on earth is our dear HG? Let me guess: Is this the nom de plum of Mr Naik and I'm being sarcastic"

>My ANswer : Hey did your mommas did not give you this book "Time Machine" when you were in your little American kindergarten , sonny ? Google "Time Machine" and you will find who H.G.Wells is.

ROTFL HG is your primary literary sources that would support the little qissa about Muhammad's bogus so called letters?

Oh argument from kuffar right ?

>My Answer : I consider the following as acceptance that you are ignorant of H.G. Wells or unable to refute my reference regarding H.G. Wells's quotation of the letters in question.

Mr ignorant: There is no EXTANT historical evidence that can attest to such letters

Shame on you for not even knowing that to look for

>Bye the bye who this ... Hoyland is ? Is he another of your invention like those two Germans Gerd Puin or so ?

Let me guess you did google both names. So what did you find? Do you want to share with us?

>My Answer : Among the search results there are three main items.

Let me guess you checked in amazon.com and you googled it and you found "Hoyland survey" right? but you are not man enough to admit it and now you realize that we kuffar know so much about Islam and that we do not buy your islamic BS

>One is a town called Hoyland in UK , there is a character called Bob Hoyland in an Australian soap opera and there is a British abstruct Artist called John Hoyland.

Hypocrite

>For the readers: I'm not in the habit of spoon feeding tablighees but I urge you to check amazon.com and google "hoyland survey"

I do not spoon feed lazy tablighees our dear deb al-tablighee

>So there exists nothing called Hoyland that you refer.

Hypocrite

So all of your claims of refuting the existence of Prophet Mohammad's letters to the Byzantine and Persian emperrors are thereby without any foundation and those of your claims should be considered by readers here.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".