More answer to DNM

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (India), Jun 6, 2010 at 13:31

Hi,

You said this.

"In response to Debanjan's comment I like to opine that Temple mount was destroyed by muslim savages after invention of islam and then forced convertion of tribals in the middle east and civilized Jews into tribal cult."

It makes sense

>My Answer : Another despicable lie.

The despicable liar is not him it is you

My Answer : If you can prove me that I have lied by saying that Romans destroyed Jerusalem's second temple , prove me a liar. Remember in western tradition , the onus lies on the one who makes the accusation.

So what proof do you that Umayyads are Christianized Arabs ? What proof do you have that the Al-Aqsa Mosque is a Byzantine church ? Remember if you can read history , Nestorians never had any good relations with the Byzantines so why on earth the "Christian nestorian" Umayyads would built a church on their enemy style ?

Another point has it ever come to you that why the Crusaders did not destroy the Al-aqsa mosque when they ruled Jerusalem for 80 years ? Remember the Crusaders were sworn enemies of the Orthodox creed so do you think that there is any reason that why the Crusaders did not destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque ? Because they knew that it is a Mosque and destruction of that Mosque would bring the animosity and thereby destruction of the crusader states. If it was a Byzantine Church then they well have destroyed it since the Byzantines were very much a spent force by that time.

You have made following outrageous claims :

1. The first four Caliphs did not exist.
2. All the early Muslims were some kind of Christian peoples.

Now what lie will you tell next ? Tomorrow will you say that Prophet Mohammad himself was a Christian ?

Bye the bye I am still waiting for your evidence that Paul Revere did exist.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".