Bogus again and again

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 29, 2007 at 12:59

I must admit that you have really audacity to debate a language that you do not know. I will never debate Urdu for example as I know no Urdu. Oh, I know the koufta, well this does not qualify me as alm al-nahw fi al-lughat al-Urdu

You wrote

>I am not writing Arabic script here

Could it be because you do not know any Arabic?

>I am writing here English alphabet

Bogus again. It is called transliteration and there are rules for it and you are cluelss about these rules. and no these are Roman letters. Well again if you had no clue that the plural of people is peoples why should you have any clue about proper Arabic/ English transliteration?

>As you say Bashar means mankind...you say bashar means human

Bogus again. But what took you so long? And: It is not I that say that it is dictionaries that say that! And bogus again because the word bashar means: mankind/womankind

>I agree

who really cares if you agree or not.

>but when you say bashar means humanity I disagree

And your reference from a dictionary? In actual fact Medicine means al-teb al-bashari (the medicine of humanity) Your claim is bogus.

>Also Naas means people in general

And your point is?

>it does not mean people of particular place like Arabia

Bogus again. The words 3Alam and nas means _defined_ people and it does not mean and is not equal to the word bashar. Your claim is bogus.

>If Qur'an was for Arabs

No It is _THE_ Qur'an was for _THE_ Arabs What is the matter with you tablihgees and the definte article?

>It wtill use the term Ahl Al-Arab rather than saying Al-Nas

What on earth are you talking about? I read this as: gobbledygook

Q14:4 says wa ma arsalna min rasulan ila bilisani qawmuhu

Do you know what this means? It means you can use another word and it is qawm and Muhammad was sent to his qawm the Hijazi Arabs because he spoke their language. Shame on you for wasting my time

Sorry but Islam is the religion of the arabs only and you ain't one.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".