Submitted by David W. Lincoln (Canada), Jul 18, 2007 at 12:07
When you have armaments being stored at mosques, whatever protection they had accorded to them as edifices where the faithful gather - that protection is gone with the wind.
Any place that stores weaponry is a legitimate target to be razed to the ground.
So, why should mosques be exempt from this? After all, it isn't as if Mosques have a sterling reputation to defend when it comes to the building of societies.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".