Red Mosque in rebellion:A reply to Jorge Cordova

Submitted by Jaisingh Thakur (India), Jul 29, 2007 at 01:51

I am in full agreement with the views expressed by Jorge Cordova. One more mosque in the neighbourhood means, not only one more source of civic nuisance, but also one more menace and threat to the peace-loving community. Having never visited a mosque in my life and having no intention whatsoever of ever doing it, I am in no position to pronounce whether the sermons preached by the mullahs within its precincts have any such impact on the attendants as would go to enrich their life and elevate it to a higher level of consciousness.

However,if experience is any guide, the contrary is only to be expected. The faithfuls return from their prayer mats determined to carry out a few more blasts, preferably on Fridays at prayer-time, and kill and miam as many kafirs as the potential of the RDX and gelatine sticks allows them to. Our politicians, always hungry for muslim votes, and in the West European context, to be seen as great champions of liberty and multi culturalism and practitioners of tolerance, are squarely to be blamed for this increasing source of danger to the life and security of the peace-loving citizens all over the world.

No words can therefore aptly sum up the gratitude and praise which honest, objective and anlaytical intelluctuals like Dr. Daniel Pipes richly deserve for having provided a forum for us to voice our concerns and fears . If, at any date in the near future, isalmism and its stooges are routed in every sphere of life and are made to retreat to the desert caves of Arabia, it will be largely to the ceaseless efforts and untiring zeal of such disinterested intelluctuals, dedicated to the pursuit of truth and genuine peace, as against personal aggrandisement as is the case with our leftists and their camp followers. Jorge I would also love to see that smile on the face of evey woman. let us all stop electing all those crooked politicians.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".