What part of "Sharia Law has already been instituted into the U.S. Treasury Dept" do you not understand? And how much else?

Submitted by kman (United States), Aug 7, 2009 at 00:55

Further more, the Islamists DO speak for the majority of the Muslims. The shrieking silence from the "majority of Muslims" over militant Islam's atrocities speaks volumes about whom they support. Their mosques give generously to militant causes all over the globe. Again, the attendees remain dutifully "silent".

The reason British female police officers cow to Islam? They're scared. The Muslims blatantly march around with signs (and faces covered with scarves) right in front of British police officers saying all kinds of things about what Muslims believe in - like beheading non-believers. Perhaps you haven't seen the video footage captured in Great Britain that shows a number of their police officers in full running retreat from an advancing mob of Muslims.

Of course, if one avails oneself of only news media like the New York or Los Angeles Times "newspapers" or CNN TV coverage, then I guess it's perfectly understandable.

The so-called moderate Muslims don't have to do anything intimidating. Their bretheren have already accomplished that for them. The moderates only have to smile sweetly and pretend others aren't intimidated by the heinous atrocities committed by the "radicals". Anonymous and threatening phone calls are made to politicians and many other selected and strategic public and non-public officials all the time. Any wonder they carry Korans around with them?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".