Another victim of poor education and Arabian imperialism

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 11, 2009 at 07:38

Our dear TM who is a lost tablighee wrote

>So what did we learn from our dear Dhimmi no more this time? Nothing. Not a thing.

That does not surprise me and do you know why? Because you have no clue what the words aqaneem or makkar really mean so do you know what the word aqneem and makkar really mean? May be you should ask one of your Arab masters mr agnostic

> Because we have already learned that Dhimmi no more is an Arab christian who has faced such oppression from Arabs that it took a great toll on his mental health, and lowered his IQ level to that of a 12 year old. OR, you are just running away from the issue.

And what does this have to do with the fact that

1. The Qur'an says that Jesus must be Allah and do you want to know more and I'm not even the author of this poor theology

2. Allah has aqaneem

3. Allah says that he is ,makkar

4. Then Allah aka Jesus can talk to himself and ask for help from another aqnoom when he is not because he has aqaneem and he is makkar

5. Oh al-Injiil? It is a kitab muharraf so do you quote kutub maharaffa ?

6. You need to stick to Urdu

7.May be you need to ask one of your Arab masters to tell you what these two words are all about

8. It would be an honor to be a Christian Arab but I'm neither Arab (astaghfirullah) or Christian and I'm a Meccan Pagan

>I have already proven that Jesus is not god according to your bible,

Who told you that I care about what the Bible says or does not say?After all I do not quote a kitab muharraf like you mr ignorant to prove a point

>but since you don't have any counter arguments,

What counter arguments? You are a fake

>the only thing you can do is write Arabic phrases and act like they prove me wrong. >>I read this as you have no clue what the word aqaneem means but you see our dear TM this word is central to the eli eli lama sabchatni thing Right!

Oh these Arabic words are centeral to this debate

>Christian theology can be proven from Muslim books!

I'm not debating Christian theology and I care less what Christian theologians say or do not say. I read the Qur'an in Arabic something that wannabe Arabs like you cannot do and I tell you what it says and that is it

>Ever considered a career as a stand up comedian?

That is not a bad career you? you need to read a real book and get a life

>>I read this as you are beyond clueless but wait: would you agree with me that your Allah says that al-nasarra harafu al-injiil right mr demagogue? Oh the Arabic? you can ask your Mullah to tell you what it means. But do you know what this means? how do you know that Matthew 27:46 is not tahreef ?

I have had similar discussions with Muslims, so as soon as you translate the Arabic phrases, I'll forward these arguments to them.

Really? I read this as: you do not know any Arabic and you have imaginary friends. So why not ask one of your Arab masters to tell you what they mean.

>Till then, I'll use Muslim arguments against you!

What Muslim arguments? Oh that Allah spoke to an Arabian warlord and caravan raider via an angel? right?

>Yes, that's what I do, forward their arguments to you, and yours to them, because each group simply assumes that I belong to the other! And here's my reply to the rest of your post: gobbledygook! In your next post, make sure you can defend your ridiculous beliefs.

Islamic gobbledygook and I will not tell you what these words mean

> Matthew 27:46 proves Jesus isn't god

Oh we are back again: your Allah says that the injiil is a kitab muharraf right? Then why do you quote a kitab muharraf to prove a point you tell us?

>and the best argument you have is that the Koran says he is!

The Qur'an says that "he is" What?Oh that Jesus is God? But this is what the Qur'an says and I'm not the author of this poor theoogy

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".