No Sharia - we are civilized!

Submitted by Thomas Justin Kaze (Australia), Nov 22, 2006 at 23:31

No matter how it infuriates Muslims and no matter how it makes their supporters (CAIR, the suicidal Left and the ever-willing, self-appointed dhimmi prostitutes) howl in outrage and protest, Sharia law has no room in the free, modern and democratic society of the XXI Century.

Muslims may try and bluff us with assurances that they "need" the "law of Allah" solely to "better run their religious and family lives" and that there can be no Islam without Sharia (we already know that there can be no Islam without Jihad), that it will only apply to mosques and family matters and that it will in no way concern or affect the non-Muslim majority – but we are not that stupid. Muslims think that they are smart; maybe they are, but we are smarter; we will not fall for this lie. At-taqiyya, of course, but at-taqiyya is a lie, deception, a war stratagem – and they are telling us, time and again, that they are not at war with us. Good try, Muslims.

Sure, Sharia will apply to mosques – it already does – and so it perfectly justifies the preaching of hate and of Islamization by sword; in practice, no American or European court can jail a Muslim cleric for preaching violent Jihad, even though it is nothing else but blatant incitement to crime and murder. As for that innocently-sounding "family affairs" thing, this is the way I see it: according to this Stone-Age set of laws, Muslim women who happen to be American, French or German citizens or British subjects, can be enslaved, oppressed, mistreated or slain, to protect some "family honor" or for some "un-Islamic conduct".

The same Sharia will justify murder of non-Muslims by Muslims and protect terrorists and their associates from prosecution by the civilized (non-Muslim) justice system, false evidence notwithstanding – taqiyya rules OK. Non-Muslim rape victims will be stoned to death for immoral conduct and their rapists, as Muslims, will go free. You see – when you are raped by a Muslim, it is as if Allah himself has done you a favor by raping you, because Muslims are his true representatives (I do not think he deserves the capital H). I could provide an endless list of similar disturbing instances of how the introduction of the cursed Sharia law will in fact give Muslims the upper hand and facilitate Islamization of the free world, but I do not think it necessary.

After a few more street riots, France may admit the defeat and consider herself subdued; the not-so-great anymore Great Britain may follow the suit – oh but Britannia no longer rules the waves; she is even afraid to make waves, lest Muslims go overboard and start screaming their trademark war-cry – again. The sad truth is that we give them a finger, and they want to take the whole arm, or both. I can give them a finger, but only symbolically and from a safe distance.

Democracy cannot, must not become a tool for the invaders to conquer and destroy. If it appears to be doing just that, it means that it has failed and must be replaced by a more definite and functional force; and that, in turn, means: NO to the Islamic conquest, NO to Islamization, NO to the Sharia law and NO to tolerance of intolerance. It is time to limit, if not stop altogether, all Muslim immigration, since we cannot – under the present law – stop their population growth in any other way. Perhaps taking away the "special privileges", closing of all halal shops and encouraging Muslim émigrés, using financial incentives, to go back to their beloved Islamistan could be a good start?

Thomas Justin Kaze

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".