Guiding the perplexed our dear يوسف قناوة! Islamic literary sources about Muhammad were written by "Liars and Plagiarists" Part two

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 26, 2018 at 09:42

For the readers; The Muslim literary sources are very late. Muslims started to write their books in the late second century of Islam. And Muslims back then and now are in the habit of calling the authors of their literary sources as: Lairs and Plagiarists! Even the man whose version of the Qur'an (his name is Hafs) is today's Cairo Qur'an is described as not trustworthy when it comes to his collection of al-Ahadith (pl of Hadith) and that he was a liar and a plagiarist! The real disaster here is if he is not trustworthy in collecting al-Ahadith why should we believe his Qur'an? Do you get our dear Yosef?

BTW: Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi provide us with the earliest sources about the life of Abul Qasim aka Muhammad!

Now more disasters: As for Sirat Rasul Allah the main sources are Ibn Ishaq's Sirat rasul Allah which is not even extant but we have an edited version by Ibn Hisham Now, many Muslim Ulama call him a liar and a plagiarist and that he was getting his information from the books of the Jews and Christians and he was making things up! So much for Ibn Ishaq

al-Waqidi (the author of al-Maghazi or the Invasions which is Muhammad's Sira during his Medina period) is also called a liar and a plagiarist and that he was quoting (the useless) Pre-Islamic poetry!

So much for al-Waqidi

So we are left with nothing about the life of your so called Prophet and his Nasab Ismael included!

Oh you will find this online chat about the fact that both Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi were unreliable, liars and plagiarists! So we are left with nothing about the life of Muhammad Not a thing

Here is the link:

http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vb/showthread.php?t=369932

Do you know what this means our dear Yosef? It means that your little spin is based on fraudulent literary sources

What a disaster

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".