|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Our dear Barbaric Pagan: The fate of the Qur'an at the hands of Othman v The fate the Nag Hammadi LibraryReader comment on item: Hungary: Not "Submitting to Islam" Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 28, 2018 at 16:53 Well, this is beyond our dear Barbaric Pagan For the readers: Compare the fate of the Qur'an at the hands of Othman who burned, yes burned, copies of the Qur'an that he did not accept and let us not forget the disaster of the goat that ate the Qur'an or the missing verses from Surat al-Ahzab where we are told that it was as long as Surat al-Baqara! What a disaster the Qur'an is a corrupted book. However, did Muslims care about filling in the gaps missing from the Quranic text thanks to the goat that ate the text and Othman who burned it? May the Gods forbid And what happened to the verses missing from Surat al-Ahzab? Any guesses our dear BP? Compare this with the Nag Hammadi Library from Egypt that included the likes of the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas and many other texts including works by Plato. Athanathius of Alexandria wanted to get rid of these texts (not unlike Othman) because he regarded these texts as apocryphal (not unlike the Ahadith rejected by al-Bukhari). The monks did not agree that books can be destroyed or burned and the books were saved. Again it was Christians that saved the literary works from the late antique and Helenized world that was to be destroyed by Islam The Western civilization owes it to Christians for preserving the historical texts of their civilization and in this case the Gnostic and Neoplatonist texts So you tell us our dear BP are you a Muslim who is practicing Taqiyya or are you really, and you must pardon me ignorant?
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (70) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |